Saying that is crap IMO, given that they've also said Watson must be prepared to be bat anywhere in the top 6.If Australia were to drop Michael Hussey and the selectors said that they didn't want to disrupt the rest of the batting order so everyone else was staying in the same spot, who would you bring into the team at number 4?
Okay.Saying that is crap IMO, given that they've also said Watson must be prepared to be bat anywhere in the top 6.
Bailey has been sticking up his hand, but I don't see why they wouldn't give it to Rogers. I mean if Katich can open and Hussey can bat at 4, then I'm sure Rogers could handle batting out of position slightly.Okay.
Who's the best candidate for the Australian number 4 position outside the current XI?
True, but I answered the question with aplomb I thinkWould be the most ridiculous thing ever if they had Katich and Watson opening and Rogers batting in the middle order.
Btw, I was saying that the selectors saying that was crap, not you asking the question.Okay.
Who's the best candidate for the Australian number 4 position outside the current XI?
Push Katich or Watson down from opening and pick Hughes. Simple.Okay.
Who's the best candidate for the Australian number 4 position outside the current XI?
True, but I answered the question with aplomb I think
LOL, I thought so, but for a couple of seconds I was like hang on who's crap, me or the selectors, I then realized one of them is Hilditch and realized you must have meant them.Btw, I was saying that the selectors saying that was crap, not you asking the question.
Push Katich or Watson down from opening and pick Hughes. Simple.
You've both missed the point.^^
Indeed. Katich preferbaly @ 4, with Watto batting @ 6.
Garner? I thought David Williams was the coach....That would be ridiculous. They'd be replacing a bowler who looked really good in the final innings, and dismissed Ponting with some disciplined bowling. Instead of a pretty useless bowler whose only wicket came with a bad ball and a brilliant Bravo grab? I can't see Garner standing for that.
I know you know what I meant, but I'll just explain for the more ignorant among us...Garner? I thought David Williams was the coach....
Complete repeat of the Bollinger incident.
I think he genuinely didn't know who Bollinger was. I never got the impression that Gayle was the the keen student of cricket that doesn't directly affect him. i.e. cricket that he's not playingComplete repeat of the Bollinger incident.