• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* West Indies In Australia

AlanJLegend

U19 Vice-Captain
I was more making fun of the fact that Hodge is awesome but never got a spot in the team (despite scoring 200*), and is now retiring.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
If Australia were to drop Michael Hussey and the selectors said that they didn't want to disrupt the rest of the batting order so everyone else was staying in the same spot, who would you bring into the team at number 4?
Saying that is crap IMO, given that they've also said Watson must be prepared to be bat anywhere in the top 6.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Okay.

Who's the best candidate for the Australian number 4 position outside the current XI?
Bailey has been sticking up his hand, but I don't see why they wouldn't give it to Rogers. I mean if Katich can open and Hussey can bat at 4, then I'm sure Rogers could handle batting out of position slightly.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Would be the most ridiculous thing ever if they had Katich and Watson opening and Rogers batting in the middle order.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Btw, I was saying that the selectors saying that was crap, not you asking the question. :thumbsup:
LOL, I thought so, but for a couple of seconds I was like hang on who's crap, me or the selectors, I then realized one of them is Hilditch and realized you must have meant them.

As for these 2 quotes:

Push Katich or Watson down from opening and pick Hughes. Simple.
^^
Indeed. Katich preferbaly @ 4, with Watto batting @ 6.
You've both missed the point.
 

shivfan

Banned
That would be ridiculous. They'd be replacing a bowler who looked really good in the final innings, and dismissed Ponting with some disciplined bowling. Instead of a pretty useless bowler whose only wicket came with a bad ball and a brilliant Bravo grab? I can't see Garner standing for that.
Garner? I thought David Williams was the coach....
:cool:
In cricket, the manager's role is supposed to be one of booking hotels, logistics, etc. If Garner is taking the lead on selection issues, what is Little Willie's role in the team?
 

Vikas Bhatt

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
WI lost a good chance to be in the run last test. Now with the series decided in Aus's favour even if they lose the last test, WI might as well give the Aussie's a bloody nose before leaving the shores. I hope they win the last test!
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Complete repeat of the Bollinger incident.
I think he genuinely didn't know who Bollinger was. I never got the impression that Gayle was the the keen student of cricket that doesn't directly affect him. i.e. cricket that he's not playing
 

Top