• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

World Cup 2010

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Can't happen. You don't get to the World Cup final without being a damn good team, whether you were one of those FIFA decided were supposed to be good beforehand or not.
History seems to agree with that. Only 6 teams have made the final since 1966, with all the form teams from the tournaments reaching the 3rd/4th Playoff.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So should we seed the FA Cup to stop that from ever happening again?

The World Cup's a different proposition as far as I'm concerned anyway. If you were to propose a worst-case scenario by picking the 16 teams you think are the weakest and playing them off against each other for a few weeks to see which one was the best, the winner would certainly still be capable of giving anyone a game.

I'll concede that you could end up with a particularly weak semi-final. But that happens a lot anyway. Brazil-Turkey and Germany-South Korea?
 
Last edited:

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
So should we seed the FA Cup to stop that from ever happening again?
Local tournament, I don't really care...but wouldn't moan if it happened. Watched that FA Cup final and Millwall were Bangladesh-esque.

The World Cup's a different proposition as far as I'm concerned anyway. If you were to propose a worst-case scenario by picking the 16 teams you think are the weakest and playing them off against each other for a few weeks to see which one was the best, the winner would certainly still be capable of giving anyone a game.
Brazil vs Greece would be a fairly one-sided final.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
I'll concede that you could end up with a particularly weak semi-final. But that happens a lot anyway. Brazil-Turkey and Germany-South Korea?
if the refs had been doing their job, it'd have been Germany - Italy

(though admittedly that'd leave Australia - Germany in 06)
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
So should we seed the FA Cup to stop that from ever happening again?

The World Cup's a different proposition as far as I'm concerned anyway. If you were to propose a worst-case scenario by picking the 16 teams you think are the weakest and playing them off against each other for a few weeks to see which one was the best, the winner would certainly still be capable of giving anyone a game.

I'll concede that you could end up with a particularly weak semi-final. But that happens a lot anyway. Brazil-Turkey and Germany-South Korea?
No we shouldn't seed the FA Cup, as that is the whole point of that competition. There are leagues to ensure we have matchups between the best sides, it is a straight knockout, and seeding it would be completely pointless.

The World Cup is a different proposition as it's the only time the best teams in the world all get together. The WC Final is supposed to be football's showpiece match. Brazil-Greece would be yucky.
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No we shouldn't seed the FA Cup, as that is the whole point of that competition. There are leagues to ensure we have matchups between the best sides, it is a straight knockout, and seeding it would be completely pointless.

The World Cup is a different proposition as it's the only time the best teams in the world all get together. The WC Final is supposed to be football's showpiece match. Brazil-Greece would be yucky.
FA Cup is sort of semi-seeded, in that the very best teams don't join the competition until relatively late (after the billion pre-qualifying and qualifying rounds and 2 proper rounds) but yeah, the magic comes when Aston Villa play Man Utd in the 3rd round like they do every year.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
:laugh:

Yeah, if the cup was seeded it would actually help teams like mine as it would give us a huge shot at a big tie each year. We'd be seeded in round one, get in theory the weaker teams up until the third, and then get a decent draw due to being lower seeds at that point.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
The FAOi appears to be trying to row the boat back upstream...

Ireland angry with Sepp Blatter for making '33rd-team' suggestion public | Football | guardian.co.uk

Hell, anyone who tries to attack Blatter deserves a bit of support. And

1. Ensure that Fifa's rules cannot be changed midway through a tournament, for whatever reason, commercial or otherwise.
should be obvious, but isn't at present (though it should be rewritten as "ensure that all relevant rules are codified before the start of the tournament")
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
:laugh:

Yeah, if the cup was seeded it would actually help teams like mine as it would give us a huge shot at a big tie each year. We'd be seeded in round one, get in theory the weaker teams up until the third, and then get a decent draw due to being lower seeds at that point.
We very very nearly went out in a qualifying round for as far as i can tell the first time ever this season. I miss the brief time we were in the same division as Tranmere. :(
 

Steulen

International Regular
The big problem with the WC is that all the good matches are in the group stage, while the knock-out stages are invariably boring as hell, with the exception of the minor nuclear war that was Portugal-Netherlands four years ago.

So bin seeding and let's have the good games early. And then Brazil can lift the trophy after beating Italy 1-0.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Can't happen. You don't get to the World Cup final without being a damn good team, whether you were one of those FIFA decided were supposed to be good beforehand or not.
Naaah. There's been some proper shyte finalists: Argentina in 90, Germany in 02 & Italy in 06. The latter actually won the thing.

and since 1966 they've been seeding the group draws :p
Goes back further than that, even. The group stage for 54 was definitely seeded. Although there were 4 teams in each group, there were two seeds and two non-seeds and seeds only played the unseeds so each country only played twice.

Dunno about 58 or 62 tho.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
Goes back further than that, even. The group stage for 54 was definitely seeded. Although there were 4 teams in each group, there were two seeds and two non-seeds and seeds only played the unseeds so each country only played twice.
Ah yes, had forgotten. Legendary system. Was made even better by the lack of any separation on goal difference, so the seeds who had lost earlier (Turkey and Italy) got an extra chance to play off...and still failed :laugh:
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
All the seeds praying they don't come up against Australia tbh. :ph34r:

Can feel an ANZAC final coming on, at odds of 14 billion - 1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top