No no, just ODIs. Only includes games between two test nations, ftr.That including domestic?
+1i vote for ab to never take the gloves...ever.
Yup. Poor bowling's a bigger factor today than losing the toss imo.Eng will continue to be a middling ODI team until they find some bowlers
They have some good batsmen who'll win them some games but with this attack, you'd fancy more days like this I'm afraid
Haha, I'm actually pretty sure I've benefited from your system a lot more than you have; you seem to forget a lot of the time. I'll remind you next time.No no, just ODIs. Only includes games between two test nations, ftr.
It's not actually thirteen in a row for the toss-winner though. Ricky Ponting pulled the schoolboy error of fielding first in this match, before collapsing to Nicky Boje. The last test side to lose batting first was South Africa in this match nine and a half years ago.
You still get remarkably good value on the toss-winner though. D/N ODIs are the only area I've found since I've been old enough to gamble where I know that I definitely have a big edge on the bookies. Gutted I missed this one.
They have been, yeah. I wonder how heavily the history of the ground impacts visiting teams now. When you come to a ground where the toss-winner never loses and the toss-winner seems to always be South Africa, it must be hard to keep your team's heads from dropping when they get off to a half-decent start.Yup. Poor bowling's a bigger factor today than losing the toss imo.
And tbf the Saffers have batted beautifully.
SA by 100+ afaics.
Haha yeah. And on one of the few times I did remember, NZ managed to out-crap the toss at Colombo during the Compaq Cup. Recouped the losses a few days later on India at the same ground, but was still raging.Haha, I'm actually pretty sure I've benefited from your system a lot more than you have; you seem to forget a lot of the time. I'll remind you next time.
Maybe. Strauss was certainly aware of the importance of the toss when interviewed yesterday. And he must be aware that his attack isn't the greatest. I suppose he figures that there will be times when they get a good caning, but he also knows SA can collapse sometimes - shades of the recent Ashes, I suppose.They have been, yeah. I wonder how heavily the history of the ground impacts visiting teams now. When you come to a ground where the toss-winner never loses and the toss-winner seems to always be South Africa, it must be hard to keep your team's heads from dropping when they get off to a half-decent start.
Yeah its a good strategy, but you have to do it in matches where the dew doesn't have the opposite effect right?Haha yeah. And on one of the few times I did remember, NZ managed to out-crap the toss at Colombo during the Compaq Cup. Recouped the losses a few days later on India at the same ground, but was still raging.
Yeah, England certainly have what it takes to compete with South Africa. Beating them six times in a row proved that. There are a lot of doubters, there always is in English cricket, but I think Strauss knows they have what it takes to win the series.Maybe. Strauss was certainly aware of the importance of the toss when interviewed yesterday. And he must be aware that his attack isn't the greatest. I suppose he figures that there will be times when they get a good caning, but he also knows SA can collapse sometimes - shades of the recent Ashes, I suppose.