Cena breaking the streak would be such a waste given how over his is anyway, it wouldn't mean anything. I love Cena, I really do, but I would hate to see that happen. If the streak is ever broken (and I don't believe that it will be) then I'd hope it would be for someone who was destined to be as big as Austin or The Rock, anything else would be a waste.
Yeah Taker vs McMahon is what I would expect as well, and that does seem to be the rumour going around. However, if the streak were to end, I can't think of anyone other than Cena who the E would want to break it, or who I personally would be willing to see break it. That's not to say I want to see it broken, I really would not, but if someone had to do it, I would rather it were him.
Cens or Kane, for me. Of course, Kane would need a small push and to lose some weight, but I do not think either are beyond him.
My point is that if anyone was to break it, we shouldn't have heard of them yet as there is nobody out there destined for Austinesque stardom just yet. Cena breaking it would be completely pointless IMO.
Unfortunately I think it is totally beyond Kane tbh. Much as I used to love the guy, the is no way he is anywhere near over enough to even be close to beating Taker at WM, not in a million years.
Well, yes and no imo. To take a punt on a young guy beating Taker really would be a massive risk, and thanks to Brock Lesnar that kind of thing is really never going to happen. Apparently the consensus amongst the E management, is that if anyone has to do it, it is more likely to be an established star, as they don't want another young guy pushed to the moon who then buggers off after a year or so. Kind of a sticky situation to be in really, because like you say, the argument for Cena going over is full of holes, but I really cannot think of anyone else that the E would have enough faith in to be given such a task. Though it would not be ideal, I think Cena breaking the streak, would be good in the sense that it would create a real wrestlemania moment, it would draw huge and would be a great spectacle and as such would not be totally wasted, though probably not ideal.
I think that is slightly harsh tbh, the guy has been a great servant to the E, never once complained about being put in endless stupid storylines and being booked terrible and generally being used as a vehicle to get other people who are less talented than himself over. He still can work a good match, though thanks to the the creative "geniuses" backstage his character and credibility are totally shot, which is a shame. He has played his part in a hell of a lot of mark out moments for me personally as well, really liked him back in the day, will always be a kind of favourite of mine for those reasons.
An established star beating Taker would just be so pointless though, IMO, what would it achieve? I mean, sure, a great WM moment or whatever, but you get some guy who's set to be the new Austin to beat Taker at Mania and a star is born. Established stars don't need to end the streak and it would waste twenty years in which a legend has been built up.Well, yes and no imo. To take a punt on a young guy beating Taker really would be a massive risk, and thanks to Brock Lesnar that kind of thing is really never going to happen. Apparently the consensus amongst the E management, is that if anyone has to do it, it is more likely to be an established star, as they don't want another young guy pushed to the moon who then buggers off after a year or so. Kind of a sticky situation to be in really, because like you say, the argument for Cena going over is full of holes, but I really cannot think of anyone else that the E would have enough faith in to be given such a task. Though it would not be ideal, I think Cena breaking the streak, would be good in the sense that it would create a real wrestlemania moment, it would draw huge and would be a great spectacle and as such would not be totally wasted, though probably not ideal.
Still holding out for Shelton Benjamin to break it tbh
Two questions for you sledgee.
Haha, well ok. I would base the fact that he has never complained on the fact that such complaints have never been publicised. With the internet and such in the modern day, most complaints guys make end up being leaked out, but I have never seen Kane fall foul of this, if I am wrong though, I would retract the comment.Two questions for you sledgee.
1 - How do you know he's never complained?
2 - Who are these people who are less talented than him? I've never seen them that's for sure.
His debut run in 97 was epic, built up in a way which I doubt we'll ever see again and then the five-month lead-up to the Taker-Kane match at WM14 was immense, playing its part in one of the F's most exciting ever periods of TV. Once him and Undertaker started playing buddies the guy has been as boring as hell bar the odd bit here and there and his character has lost all credibility over the years. He sux.
Triple H is the better wrestler and is far more legitimate as a World Heavyweight Champion than Kane but I think Kane has deserved a better run with the top. In the past he had a great character, was over with the fans and should've had a better run.
WWE, or America in general.
Hahahaha, can you imagine if that happened, there would be a ****storm.
