Strauss?In the context of the series, i'd have to say Collingwood's or Anderson's at Cardiff have proved to be the most important.
Strauss?In the context of the series, i'd have to say Collingwood's or Anderson's at Cardiff have proved to be the most important.
Those were more important innings, but in terms of technical proficiency, temperament and quality of construction I'd place this Hussey innings right up there, his shot selection has been supreme. I'd place Strauss at Lords a little behind it, also think Clarke's played beautifully this summer. North was awesome at Edgbaston too.In the context of the series, i'd have to say Collingwood's or Anderson's at Cardiff have proved to be the most important.
Just points out the obvious TBH, frustrating as sin.Still nervous, but can breathe a little easier. Is odd though, how many of the Oz wickets have been down to crass stupidity rather then English brilliance. I genuinely feel the crims would of got up, if they had brains.
This post in no way trying to make Aussies feel worse, BTW
Haha, exactly what I was typing.Still nervous, but can breathe a little easier. Is odd though, how many of the Oz wickets have been down to crass stupidity rather then English brilliance. I genuinely feel the crims would of got up, if they had brains.
This post in no way trying to make Aussies feel worse, BTW
OH FFS come on we need another 200 runs with 3 wickets in hand be serious please. Peter siddles defence is not going to thwart england winning the ashes.Siddle's looking worryingly solid in defense.
Siddle's looking worryingly solid in defense.
Hardly been chanceless though... granted the pitch has arguably been the toughest to bat on...Those were more important innings, but in terms of technical proficiency, temperament and quality of construction I'd place this Hussey innings right up there, his shot selection has been supreme. I'd place Strauss at Lords a little behind it, also think Clarke's played beautifully this summer. North was awesome at Edgbaston too.
Pizzorno said:Presenters could have lost the urn, slightly nervous tbh.
Nah see just because Australia have thrown there wickets away, you're ignoring the amount of times edges fell short and dropped catches which on any given day could have been taken.Last night I thought they had no chance, but after today I'm seriously thinking Australia could have done this. I'm not interested in all the "500 is a big number and it hasn't been done before, therefore it's impossible." England's bowling has been mediocre at best, the pitch is seriously slow and once you're in you can score as many runs as you like.
As long as you don't leave a straight ball, hit it straight to a fielder then run, play a sweep from outside your crease or whack the ball 100 feet into the air down midwicket's throat.