Count three, tbh.This is all correct and it would be wrong to say that any attack in England is currently better than Australia's but there have been times when it is pretty close, take this Hampshire atack from 2006 with two Australians in it, Clark, Tremlett, Warne, Mascarenhas, Udal. There are probably better examples than that but it shows that on occasion county atacks have very strong lineups. I think it is safe to say that Ramps has scored runs against bowlers of similar standard to the Australian bowlers for many years in county cricket, the issue with Ramps as is commonly known is not his ability to play test cricket.
Mate,I'm talking about todayCome on. Rana was one of the best bowlers in the ODI series last time he was here with Pakistan and I'd reckon Lewry'd get a go with most state sides even now, let alone when he was better a few years ago.
Agree with that.Anyway, I suppose the main point is that anyone who believes that the runs Ramp's has scored at fc level in any way guarantee that he'd me even moderately successful at The Oval is kidding themselves
He has always been talented
He has always been technically very good
And, if you believe Murray Goodwin, he has still got a **** temperament (was on the radio today saying that he'd gotten under Ramp's skin with a few well placed words that resulted in his dismissal and basically said he'd be no hope at combatting Aus sledging which would be inevitable)
Nah Dimi is too good to be restrained by nationalityCount three, tbh.
OK, but the rest of us weren't. What we're talking about is the county attacks that Ramps may have faced in recent years, not just this year. Because it's not just this year that Ramps has averaged over 100 in FC cricket, he did it twice running a few years back.Mate,I'm talking about today
Last time he played against Oz at the Oval he got 133. Against a far better attack than this (Warne, McGrath, Gillespie, Lee). Seems he didn't have much trouble "combating Aus sledging" on that occasion.anyone who believes that the runs Ramp's has scored at fc level in any way guarantee that he'd me even moderately successful at The Oval is kidding themselves
...
And, if you believe Murray Goodwin, he has still got a **** temperament (was on the radio today saying that he'd gotten under Ramp's skin with a few well placed words that resulted in his dismissal and basically said he'd be no hope at combatting Aus sledging which would be inevitable)
That was 8 years ago...but you're right, those guys were decent talkers.Last time he played against Oz at the Oval he got 133. Against a far better attack than this (Warne, McGrath, Gillespie, Lee). Seems he didn't have much trouble "combating Aus sledging" on that occasion.
However all this is academic. He will score zero runs for the simple reason that he won't be picked.
So do lots of below-average state-level "plodders".Mate,I'm talking about today
Rana, Lewry and Kirtley are far worse bowlers now than they were even a few years ago and form part of a very average fc attack
Thing is, there's no evidence to suggest he's got worse as a player since then, and some evidence (although obviously it's far from conclusive) that he's got better.That was 8 years ago...but you're right, those guys were decent talkers.
Boycs?Who said this of his hundred at the Oval in 2001?
“Ramprakash took one on the wrist from McGrath and he became visibly stronger in his desire and self-belief from that moment. This hundred may be a defining point in his career, as he now appears more settled in himself and at ease at the crease.”
Well if he gets to 133 this time I think I'd back him to avoid allowing the legendary sledging of Nathan Hauritz to goad him into a similar indiscretion...True, although even with that hundred, Warne managed to goad Ramprakash into getting stumped IIRC. When England were in sight of saving the follow-on.