• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lords

FaaipDeOiad

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
I can see this ending up with Australia losing by 100 runs or something. Makes you wonder what could have happened if the first five wickets had put on more than 120 odd.

Lovely knock from Clarke anyway, shown how easy batting is on this surface.
 
pup11

pup11

International Coach
These two no matter how well they bat can't do this on their own, need a special knock from Mitch, and handy contributions from Horrie and Siddle (though wouldn't want it to get that desperate), then we might have a slender chance, though how they handle the 2nd new ball would be massive.
 
FaaipDeOiad

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Just so our pessimistic English locals piss themselves a bit more... HowSTAT! Match Scorecard

Parallels? Keeper-batsman new to the side, early let-off, 5/126...

Just need an extra 160 runs. :ph34r:

edit: In all seriousness though, I'll be mildly excited if these two make it to stumps. Anything is possible.
 
Last edited:
vic_orthdox

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Warne and Atherton on the money regarding this being the time to have a dinkum crack. Was disappointed that Flintoff asked for a deep point after bowling a bad ball. Just don't bowl short and wide!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top