*Official* Second Test at Lords

[TT Boy]

Your out, **** off.

 

[Richard]

This won't be given.

Alright maybe it will haha. Batted Phillip. Technical masterclass that.

FML, these are never given by TV umpires

Good job it didn't go there then.

 

[chalky]

Whoo looked close to the ground on that replay

 

[duffer]

That was less out than the one given not out.

 

[superkingdave]

Actually that's pretty terrible from the umpires...that was grounded

 

[Craig]

That looked very similar to Bopara's none dissmissal last night.

 

[Neil Pickup]

I have no doubt that he held that - in the same way I have no doubt that Hauritz held Bopara yesterday.

I thought for all money that was the referral to the TV - and it wouldn't have been given had it been referred as per the Bopara - Hauritz dismissal yesterday.

I thought you were playing by the spirit of cricket, though, Ricky?

 

[pasag]

**** OFF you dirty cheating poms.

 

[Richard]

youre ****ing joking

No, it's been given out, deal with it.

 

[pup11]

Big test of temperament this for the young Prince, if he does well in this situation and helps his side reach safe shores, it would do further prove that he is the real deal.

Meh....

Rudi you ****in' bastard....

 

[wfdu_ben91]

1-0, well done Rudi.

 

[jondavluc]

your out, **** off.

 

[NUFAN]

Hmm... Pretty disappointed, reckon Hauritz no catch with Bopara batting looked more out.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Your out, **** off.

How about you **** off you ****. Obviously wrong as per usual.

 

[pasag]

Ridiculous. ****ing absurd, why didn't Rudi refer that?

 

[Craig]

Burgey to rant.

 

[Matt79]

Ffs!!!!! Going to start channelling my inner Indian fan here. Second glaring
mistake from the umpires produces the second wicket. You
can refer that, and no way was that a catch. ****!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Top_Cat]

Replay raises some doubts and had it been referred, would probably have been given not. Not sure, myself.

 

[duffer]

Complete bollocks job.

 

[pasag]

Your out, **** off.

gagfc