Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
The only way it could sound like that is for someone with a preconceived notion that follow-on enforcing > not.Why does this sound so gutless instead then?
The only way it could sound like that is for someone with a preconceived notion that follow-on enforcing > not.Why does this sound so gutless instead then?
Can confirm the former, not sure about the latter as wasn't really listening.Question, I heard that Russell Crowe was the Sky Sports Third Man and that he asked a few good questions, can anyone confirm.
Was on both TMS and Sky.Question, I heard that Russell Crowe was the Sky Sports Third Man and that he asked a few good questions, can anyone confirm.
Yeah when I first spotted that I was like "... can't remember, hopefully he was in the middle of an over?" But nope.FFS Broad opening up
Sir Jimmy or Sir James? Leaning towards the former, itbt.Gah, Broad opening again. I hope Strauss gives Anderson the chance to get his 5'fer and further nail down that knighthood of his.
England are in an unbelievably good position to win this game and even wrap it up early. They have really no reason not to. Unless they are THAT gutless that they'd rather hand Australia that bit of slack that would make a loss less likely and up the odds on a draw at the expense of trying to win.The only way it could sound like that is for someone with a preconceived notion that follow-on enforcing > not.
I love every Lancs player and I always give them my full support when they represent England. Even Saj...Love how all these members are like "yeah man I like Jimmy have for ever what a good bowler always had potential".
18 months ago you had him bowling for Lanc's 15th XI, so stuff you.
Was me tbh, and i thought exactly the same as you with regards to the incompleted over.Yeah when I first spotted that I was like "... can't remember, hopefully he was in the middle of an over?" But nope.
Can't remember who it was that said "Strauss seems to think his job as captain is not to win but to bowl Broad as much as he can" but they were on the money.
Australian.Was Crowe Australian or a Keewee?
This game is under no circumstances going to be drawn, barring some phenomenal batting from both sides. It's a question of whether Australia win or England win. England give themselves the best chance of winning and stopping Australia winning by batting again.England are in an unbelievably good position to win this game and even wrap it up early. They have really no reason not to. Unless they are THAT gutless that they'd rather hand Australia that bit of slack that would make a loss less likely and up the odds on a draw at the expense of trying to win.
I've already decided on Sir James of Anderson, Lord Manor of Burnley.Sir Jimmy or Sir James? Leaning towards the former, itbt.
Needs to knock over this first wicket quickly and no sign at all of such a thing happening yet.House can't bat but Siddle is pretty decent.