Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Marc used to try that one a lot - a statistic exists once someone compiles it. First-chance averages exist. Deal with it.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Second Test at Lords
- Thread starter superkingdave
- Start date
Son Of Coco
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yesss! Great work! Really Have to go to bed soon...
Will watch the she-male bat and hopefully get out in a little bit.
Broad cops one in the ****** first up.
Will watch the she-male bat and hopefully get out in a little bit.
Broad cops one in the ****** first up.
Last edited:
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Come on guys... we're 333/6 not 133/6. Cheer up! 
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
SirBloody Idiot
Cricketer Of The Year
Oh get up you sook Pissant. There's nothing there for him to hit.
tooextracool
International Coach
Where on earth did all this swing come from?!
Pretty flat pitch, we have the ability to get 500 here. Unless the pitch just breaks up overnight.Come on guys... we're 333/6 not 133/6. Cheer up!
The old ball. It's swinging a lot more as it gets older - we must of done a good job in shining it. Have we taken the new ball yet though? Didn't notice it...
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Beginning to think the first ball was just a dud.
EDIT: Wait, this is still the old ball!
SirBloody Idiot
Cricketer Of The Year
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
I've compiled many. I couldn't tell you Katich's off the top of my head but could find it out without too much difficulty if you really wanted.
Or actually you could...
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Thought so too actually, but no. Very weird.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
333-6 on this deck is a poor score, as 133-6 would be a poor score on a relative seamer.Come on guys... we're 333/6 not 133/6. Cheer up!
England will do well to get 400 from here, never mind 450. When you have an opening stand of the best part of 200, anything less than 600 is a letdown.
Can only pray that Anderson swings it from the start of Australia's innings and actually gets some early wickets.
Son Of Coco
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Thought it was too.
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
You might do... you might not, who knows. We've scored at a reasonable rate and we're on our way to a decent total.. If we bowl well, this might not be too bad. It's not like we're going to be out for 250 and we're out of the game.
superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Great drive home 
FFS England
FFS England
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
People are talking like 600 is a given that happens all the time... sure, we'd like a few less wickets down, but it's hardly a total disaster. We can easily win from here still.
