• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lords

Steulen

International Regular
Cook survives the nervous 60's.

It's about time that sofa landed at Lord's with the evil white robots.

God, this is boring.
 

.matt

School Boy/Girl Captain
I guess it wasn't so bad not having Clark seeming Hilfenhaus is playing what his role would have been - Just keep hitting the spot and apply pressure.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Beginning to honestly believe that England could just make Hauritz take 0-140 or so this innings. Still only a small belief, but it's come into existence now having previously been non-existent.
 

Pizzorno

State Vice-Captain
I'm not finding this boring tbh. I know it's a flat pitch and all that lark, but when was the last time England were 135-0? I'm making the most of this.
 

.matt

School Boy/Girl Captain
Bring Pete back on at Hauritz end and tell him to go for the wind. With Hilfy bowling tight Siddle will have a good chance to get a wicket if he bowls quick and straight.
 

Steulen

International Regular
I'm not finding this boring tbh. I know it's a flat pitch and all that lark, but when was the last time England were 135-0? I'm making the most of this.
I know they were 100-0 at Lord's against the Dutch recently... heh heh heh.
 

.matt

School Boy/Girl Captain
That's not good from Haddin. You could say it doesnt matter because it's a noball but it does. That was not good keeping. Slow to move then let it slip. Terrible from Hilfy, can't afford these no balls!
 

pup11

International Coach
Really need to get this no-ball problem fixed, the last thing you wanna do is to get a wicket of a no-ball on a flat track.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Awful 'keeping from Haddin. I'm sure he'll claim he heard the no-ball call, though......
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
First time I've seen two let-offs in one ball since Edgbaston 2003.

And much as it might help the self-esteem of both bowler and wicketkeeper that it doesn't actually matter that they dropped it \ bowled a no-ball, that's two errors from Australia and two let-offs, even though it's only one for Strauss.

Very poor stuff, and precisely what you can't afford on this sort of deck.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Beginning to honestly believe that England could just make Hauritz take 0-140 or so this innings. Still only a small belief, but it's come into existence now having previously been non-existent.
Sadly it seems they'll take Johnson for more than that.

Better bowling since lunch. More iffy shots in 25 minutes than the whole first session.

Haddin obviously heard that call :ph34r:. He's certainly set the standard for us today so far.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
First time I've seen two let-offs in one ball since Edgbaston 2003.

And much as it might help the self-esteem of both bowler and wicketkeeper that it doesn't actually matter that they dropped it \ bowled a no-ball, that's two errors from Australia and two let-offs, even though it's only one for Strauss.

Very poor stuff, and precisely what you can't afford on this sort of deck.
Can't count things that happen on a no-ball in the FCA IMO
 

Top