wfdu_ben91
International 12th Man
This pitch is slow and flat, but the boundaries are noticiably shorter then what they were at Cardiff aswell.
Yeah I'm surprised too, I hit the seam a lot and I'm not great by any stretch of the imagination. Never dreamed it was so difficult.I'm amazed at the success Johnson has had with such a horrid seam position. It's schoolboy stuff to get your seam position straight; I can do it and i'm completely gash.
Gavaskar and Chauhan the real surprise for me there - had no idea their record together was so good.
3340 runs at 45?Err if Cook is a success, then one has to question what on earth you have been watching. He is a classic example against what you seem to claim, in that his technical weaknesses have actually hindered him from being a successful test match opener.
Because of his angle and his unique style. Australian & South African pitches are allot faster then the ones the English are producing and hence the batsman don't have much time to react. Just ask Graeme Smith and Jacques Kallis.I'm amazed at the success Johnson has had with such a horrid seam position. It's schoolboy stuff to get your seam position straight; I can do it and i'm completely gash.
Pretty hard to hit the seam if your arm is so far from the vertical. I imagine that if he held the seam upright (relative to his arm) it might not make contact with the pitch at all; the side of the ball would make contact with the ground instead.Yeah I'm surprised too, I hit the seam a lot and I'm not great by any stretch of the imagination. Never dreamed it was so difficult.
Someone needs to tell Johnson The Ashes have started.
Yeah. But I love seeing Hobbs and Sutcliffe leading the way.Gavaskar and Chauhan the real surprise for me there - had no idea their record together was so good.
So basically you're saying Johnson can only perform on pitches that suit him? Sign of a real world class bowler that.Because of his angle and his unique style. Australian & South African pitches are allot faster then the ones the English are producing and hence the batsman don't have much time to react. Just ask Graeme Smith and Jacques Kallis.
Err get off blind numbers. He cant bat to save his life on a green top and thats the bloody whole point of an opener, someone who can see out the new ball when it is moving around.And yet he averages 45...
Why is he looking 10x worse than any of the bowlers who bowled in S.A with him though?Because of his angle and his unique style. Australian & South African pitches are allot faster then the ones the English are producing and hence the batsman don't have much time to react. Just ask Graeme Smith and Jacques Kallis.
Not the case, I'm afraid. Took plenty of wickets on the flattest decks imaginable in Aus before that series.Johnson's mainly had success when the pitches have favoured him. I'm surprised the saffers juiced theirs up so much for the first two tests. They played into his hands.
So someone like Virenda Sehwag "can't bat to save there life" then, he struggles hugely on green tops. Or Chris Gayle? Graeme Smith is technically pretty average, and struggles against swing. What about him?Err get off blind numbers. He cant bat to save his life on a green top and thats the bloody whole point of an opener, someone who can see out the new ball when it is moving around.
I couldnt care less if hes scored 4 100s against the WI on some of the flattest tracks in the world to boost his average.
Tbh, most batsmen in the modern game struggle on green tops. It's why they're so dangerous.Err get off blind numbers. He cant bat to save his life on a green top and thats the bloody whole point of an opener, someone who can see out the new ball when it is moving around..