• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* First Test at Swalec Stadium, Cardiff

wfdu_ben91

International 12th Man
Same logic could be used to argue that it doesn't matter if the whole ball pitches outside the line of leg... if it's gonna hit the stumps who cares where pitches... or indeed whether it strikes the batsman in line...

unfortunately what you are proposing is a re-writing of the lbw law which I don't think Doctrove has the authority to do...
But a piece of the ball is pitched inside the line of the stumps, why should it matter how much of it has to pitch inside when it only takes the slightest fraction of the ball to knock the bails off?
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Blimey, the Aussies here doing a good impression of whinging poms, TBF.

Good to see:)
It was Anderson, so I don't think there's that much concern. :happy: Hauritz's effort in bowling to them was far far worse.

Finally someone tries a short ball to the tail enders. It wasn't a good one, but the thought was there.
 
Last edited:

vicky

School Boy/Girl Captain
Looked plumb live there... and on replay... and on hawkeye..

looks like the umpires are in a not-out mood for lbw's... as long as they're consistent
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Oooooo.......... harsh no-ball call there. Don't know the rule exact when the whole foot isn't grounded, any insight?

EDIT: Who cares?
 
Last edited:

vicky

School Boy/Girl Captain
But a piece of the ball is pitched inside the line of the stumps, why should it matter how much of it has to pitch inside when it only takes the slightest fraction of the ball to knock the bails off?
Good point and to answer your question no idea...

but then would cricket be as much fun if half the rules didn't make any sense :)
 

King Pietersen

International Captain
Ah well, all over. 435 is a very decent score on this pitch I reckon. Hopefully Hauritz has confirmed his place for the 2nd Test as well (Y).
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Monty is laughably poor. Would wonder whether he could rival Chris Martin for lack of batting ability and general unco-ness.
 

Top