GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
I think you might have misread his postAs bad as the infiltration of 'cheat', 'racist', 'we have x number of people' into youtube comments and cricinfo comments?
I think you might have misread his postAs bad as the infiltration of 'cheat', 'racist', 'we have x number of people' into youtube comments and cricinfo comments?
**** off, soap-dodging limey ****!Shut up you convict ****
Yeah, can literally hear the knees jerking.Didn't take long before people started getting googly eyed for Harmi did it .
I don't know what worse, the overreactions or the bitterness and sulking of the people complaining about the "so-called" overreactions. Taking into account that the ones complaining generally don't know what they are talking about, I'd go for the complainers.
glad someone conveyed that message to him.Message to Harmison: Stop bowling short to Ponting he aint Phillip Hughes FFS!
Yeah, Ponting's ability to pull is what makes the battle more interesting.Message to Harmison: Stop bowling short to Ponting he aint Phillip Hughes FFS!
Yeah, can literally hear the knees jerking.
Still 9 wickets to fall this innings.
Did Willis just say Onions has more class than Siddle? Huge call.
That's the attitude that got you beaten 5-0 last time round, when you selected Ashley Giles, a guy averaging 37 with the ball in Test Cricket, but also because he could bat a bit. Onions doesn't look impressive either. So you'd be better off going with Anderson, Flintoff, Sidebottom, Harmison and Swann.Don't agree. We'd have a long tail starting at 7 if Broad doesn't play. He's started to show genuine improvement with the ball, and is a very capable batsman, definitely deserves a go in the first 3 Tests at least. The one position up for grabs will go to either Onions, Harmison, Panesar or Rashid. I'd be tempted to go for Harmison, just have to see how Onions goes in this innings. If he picks up a few then it'd be harsh to drop him.
He just compared him with McGrath and Pollock ffs.Yeah, can literally hear the knees jerking.
Still 9 wickets to fall this innings.
Did Willis just say Onions has more class than Siddle? Huge call.
Haha, how convenient.
Err dont see how hes wrong in comparing his delivery stride and bowling action to those 2. With the exception of the head looking down (which seems to be a fad in England these days) he does get close to the stumps and bowls similar lengths to Pollock for sure.He just compared him with McGrath and Pollock ffs..
Onions doesn't look impressive
Think the truth somewhere between the extremes of opinion from Ben & Bob, tbh.He just compared him with McGrath and Pollock ffs.
Agree with ur team selection but Giles is the same guy who spun Aussie middle-order at Edgbaston in 2005.That's the attitude that got you beaten 5-0 last time round, when you selected Ashley Giles, a guy averaging 37 with the ball in Test Cricket, but also because he could bat a bit. Onions doesn't look impressive either. So you'd be better off going with Anderson, Flintoff, Sidebottom, Harmison and Swann.
Just don't bring any of your 80 lines of sentence-by-sentence-quote posts in here mate. A test only lasts 5 days, and it's hard enough to stay awake through the night without having to read them.I don't know what worse, the overreactions or the bitterness and sulking of the people complaining about the "so-called" overreactions. Taking into account that the ones complaining generally don't know what they are talking about, I'd go for the complainers.
... and the same guy whose half-century at the Oval was (arguably) crucial in winning the Ashes. Batting ability should never be underestimated, particularly for someone who is basically a supporting bowler.Agree with ur team selection but Giles is the same guy who spun Aussie middle-order at Edgbaston in 2005.
At least our breath is minty-fresh**** off, soap-dodging limey ****!