Harmison is possibly the least cerebral bowler to have ever played Test cricket.
Wasn't his idea
Yeah, coming round the wicket to Hughes brainless, clearly.
That said, don't want Harmy to play in the first, but bouncing Hughes out twice will make Broad and Fred take note.
Broad has one of the worst bouncers I've ever seen. Can see it coming from Antarctica.
Yeah, coming round the wicket to Hughes brainless, clearly.
That said, don't want Harmy to play in the first, but bouncing Hughes out twice will make Broad and Fred take note.
LolWasn't his idea
Dunno. Ask Dale Steyn.So this Hughes is meant to be good right?
Could also ask Steve Harmison.Dunno. Ask Dale Steyn.
I'm excited because it wasnt just the two balls that got him out... he has clueless against it throughout both innings.I'd love to get excited about Hughes failing in this game, I really would, but even an eternal optimist like myself isn't going to make that mistake. If we get him out cheaply next week twice then we'll talk.
That's pretty harsh I feel. His bouncer has improved alot as his pace has increased. He doesn't need to bang it in too short to get it up, and has got decent players out with his bouncer, most notably bouncing Ramnaresh Sarwan out just after he'd reached his century. I've certainly seen worse bouncers than Broad's.Broad has one of the worst bouncers I've ever seen. Can see it coming from Antarctica.
As long as a monosyllabic resonse is all that's required, yeah you could.Could also ask Steve Harmison.
Don't get too carried away, apart from Pietersen, Hughes is over twice as good as any English batsman.He scored against South Africa, we get it
If he keeps looking that rubbish against the short ball in at his ribs, you can call him what you want!!Don't get too carried away, apart from Pietersen, Hughes is over twice as good as any English batsman.