• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

ICL Releases Players

Noble One

International Vice-Captain
Can you think of many that aren't around that mark that are either?

Simple truth is there aren't that many good bowlers around currently. 150kph or 130kph.
Yes spot on.

To think only 10 years ago the names we could use to compare the 150kph (Donald, Akhtar) with the 140kph (Walsh, Ambrose, Gough, Younis, Gillespie, Akram, Srinath, Ntini) and the 130kph (Pollock, Fraser, Streak, Cork, Cairns, Fleming, Kasprowicz, de Villiers, Vaas, McGrath).

Fast bowling draught indeed. Steyn, Johnson, Anderson, Taylor, Khan, Sharma, Asif, Gul are all fine fast bowlers, but the majority of the other list are better bowlers.
 

Howsie

Cricketer Of The Year
Can you think of many that aren't around that mark that are either?
Tait
Johnson
Broad
Edwards
Steyn
Lee
............

Nah your right there isn't many that are considered fast these days, but I'm guessing there are a lot of them stuck in First-Class cricket. These days if your fast, you usually get spanked around, unless you are really, really good.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
It's always been the way. If you're fast and poor, you get spanked.

It just so happened that there were quite a few fast and good bowlers in 1999 and 2000 or so. At the current time, the relatively few that are very fast (it's always been relatively few) are mostly poor. The only particularly good genuinely fast bowlers around currently are Steyn and Johnson. And Flintoff on the rare occasions he's fit.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Malinga and Edwards hard done by there. Just as good as Flintoff in Test cricket, probably even better. Malinga better in ODI too though has been injured for a long length of time. Edwards has certainly been good enough in this past year or two to have his name amongst the best genuinely fast bowlers in the world today.
 

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
Malinga and Edwards hard done by there. Just as good as Flintoff in Test cricket, probably even better. Malinga better in ODI too though has been injured for a long length of time. Edwards has certainly been good enough in this past year or two to have his name amongst the best genuinely fast bowlers in the world today.
Indeed, if West Indies could catch, Edwards would have had quite a few wickets in the home series against England. He tends to go missing often away from West Indies though, which is a shame.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Malinga and Edwards hard done by there. Just as good as Flintoff in Test cricket, probably even better. Malinga better in ODI too though has been injured for a long length of time. Edwards has certainly been good enough in this past year or two to have his name amongst the best genuinely fast bowlers in the world today.
YMBK.
z
 

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
You missed Umer Gul too
best in twenty20's
good in ODI'S
really good in tests with old reverse swinging balls
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Flintoff is a walking injury.
None of Edwards, Malinga and Flintoff are as good as Steyn or Johnson but they can certainly be mentioned in the same breath.

Malinga and Edwards are probably the most devastating bowlers in the world when in form.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I'd still rate Fidel Edwards as sub-par as a Test bowler TBH, though there's no doubt he's better now than ever. As for Maaalinga, he's interesting and always has been but has still yet to land any really big punches.

Both of them < Flintoff, comfortably. If, of course, he's ever fit again - and the "he isn't" argument has some merit.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Interesting news. Doubt anyone from Australia would get picked, but heaps of Pakis, Kiwis and Bangladeshis would make it in their national side.
 

Flem274*

123/5
The two bowlers plus the best of our current lot would be handy.

Actualy, I can see a log jam coming.

Vettori is the captain, so thats one spot gone.

If Bond is available, he will be picked, so thats two.

Oram is our allrounder, there's three.

That leaves a duel between Martin, O'Brien, Tuffey, Franklin, Southee, Mills etc.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Looking forward to see Bond on his return, hopefully even if he doesn't the pace anymore. He can add some nice variety, play for for another 18 months to 2 years injury free.
 

Top