TT Boy
Hall of Fame Member
What?Wasn't he chucking on purpose cause he couldn't get the Aussie Batsmen Out? There Should be a Punishment for that
South Africa won the ODI series both home and away thanks to their spinners.
What?Wasn't he chucking on purpose cause he couldn't get the Aussie Batsmen Out? There Should be a Punishment for that
Perera was one guy accused of chucking I'd never thought looked particularly bad, actually. Although i never saw the match in question so maybe it was one particular spell.Sheesh, that's almost Perera-Lord's-2002-esque. IIRR that was estimated (to the nearest 5 degrees) at 35.
His doosra was ruled at 26 degrees. Holy cow.
He claims he hasn't actually bowled it much during the past year and didn't even bowl it during the match in which he was called for chucking. Also apparently this is common, then in a little while he bowls the doosra legally, they pass it, then it degenrates into chucking again over time.
So how does Australia go about getting back the wickets it created during the series now? Can we have a replay? I'm sure the ICC would respond positively to a strongly-worded letter.
Yeah, it was. That Test it was, well, impossibly obvious, even just based on slo-mo 2D replays. But no-one, before or since, ever had a problem with him, and he'd been playing for ages.Perera was one guy accused of chucking I'd never thought looked particularly bad, actually. Although i never saw the match in question so maybe it was one particular spell.
I imagine, given it'll be pretty obvious to anyone on TV, that the Referee will report him if he bowls one and he'll receive a six-month ban or something.What happens now if he bowls the doosra in the game? Can the umpires call him? Or does he get reported again?
They should have to have the problem delivery tested again before they can go anywhere near it. The idea that they just wait until the smoke settles and away we go is ridiculous.think this was the case with harbhajan's doosra also ..but see him bowling that a lot now
If he bowls it in a match it should be treated like an illegal delivery in my opinion (along the lines of a warning from the umpire) and if he bowls it twice he's off for the match. If he just has to be reported again and is allowed to bowl it through the match that's very poor.I imagine, given it'll be pretty obvious to anyone on TV, that the Referee will report him if he bowls one and he'll receive a six-month ban or something.
Kinda like the situation where people are let out on bail with a curfew, which if they break, they get put into custody.