• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** West Indies in England

Kweek

Cricketer Of The Year
Brumby if you don't mind me asking, what did they cut you for? Hope you get better soon, one of my friends had his appendix out recently and post op he self medicated with opium tea! Never seen the bloke so happy!
poor old brumby is suffering from gallstones
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
I'd say Fidel's all but a world-class bowler by now. He's been real quality for quite a while.

Problem is, beyond those two bowlers they have nothing. At least England can call up bowlers of Bresnan or Onions's quality when they need a replacement. Neither even deserve a place in the side, but both are a lot better than Lionel Baker, who seems to be the best third seamer the Windies can come up with.

They have the body of a strong team now, but it's making the holes in it seem even bigger.
Baker is the incumbent so he starts but Richardson and Rampaul seem good backup. Pascal is nowhere near ready yet, but the other two I wouldn't mind being selected.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So the WI shelled some chances. Better that than not creating them at all. They just lack a bit of skill at the moment. That'll come, hopefully. England's is a decent batting line-up so I'd say they'll be pleased witht he result, if not a bit disappointed with not getting Bopara out earlier.

WI seem to be on the up which is awesome. The problem, as previously pointed out, is the depth in bowling. Not such an easy problem to solve.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I dont think they bowled well enough to have any team 289/7 on a flat pitch, let alone the dozen catches that were dropped off them. Perhaps you may think so, because of Edwards and Taylor's bloated reputation, but I honestly dont think that changes the fact that they collectively bowled fairly poorly today.
Name one Test side that has a better new ball pair then.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Name one Test side that has a better new ball pair then.
Im assuming this is some sort of joke?

South Africa (Steyn, Ntini)
Australia (Johnson, Lee/Clark/Siddle)
India (Sharma, Khan)

And hypothetically, if it werent for injuries/selectors we would also have:
England (Anderson, Hoggard)
Pakistan (Gul, Akthar)

and quite possibly:

New Zealand ( Bond, O'Brien)
 

shivfan

Banned
For once I agree with you. This WI bowling attack shouldnt even be bowling out Bangladesh, and yet they have England reeling.
Bangladesh? A bit of an over-reaction, IMHO....
:dry:
If that's the case, then watching England bowling in the Caribbean, I would say the same about the England bowling attack....
 

shivfan

Banned
Strauss said he would have bowled first as well. Don’t know why but it is now rather overcast.
In the end, it seems to have been a good call by Gayle to bowl first....

If the fielders had held their catches in the last session, England may well have been all out by stumps!
:@
 

shivfan

Banned
I dont think they bowled well enough to have any team 289/7 on a flat pitch, let alone the dozen catches that were dropped off them. Perhaps you may think so, because of Edwards and Taylor's bloated reputation, but I honestly dont think that changes the fact that they collectively bowled fairly poorly today.
Bloated reputation?
:unsure:
Who on Earth have you been listening to?

WI fans are just happy that we have two pacers who are better than the likes of Nixon McLean and Merv Dillon. It shows an improvement in quality, however incremental. Nobody's claiming that they're Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee....
8-)
Somebody sounds a little unhappy with the first day's proceedings.

With the way the ball has been swinging, I'm not at all confident about how the WIndies will bat in the first innings....
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Bangladesh? A bit of an over-reaction, IMHO....
:dry:
If that's the case, then watching England bowling in the Caribbean, I would say the same about the England bowling attack....
and I wouldnt deny that being the case. Two poor teams are playing each other at the moment and if you are waiting for me to go over the top about the performance of either one of them then you might have to sit down. West Indies performance today was absolutely shocking, there is no denying that, whether you are a WI fan or not. and the same goes for England. Both teams are about even, and thats only because they are both rubbish.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
So the WI shelled some chances. Better that than not creating them at all. They just lack a bit of skill at the moment. That'll come, hopefully. England's is a decent batting line-up so I'd say they'll be pleased witht he result, if not a bit disappointed with not getting Bopara out earlier.

WI seem to be on the up which is awesome. The problem, as previously pointed out, is the depth in bowling. Not such an easy problem to solve.
Yeah, very fair point. Of all the crucial cricketing skills catching must be the easiest one to acquire. It is good to see the Windies on the way back, even if it's still early days.

Must be heartbreaking for the bowlers tho all the same, especially after such a Trojan effort on a slow and largely flat deck.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
The commentators were talking about what Fidel Edwards's career bowling average would be if his teammates could catch. Kind of like a first-chance average for bowlers... would be interesting because at the moment his figures look very poor on the face of it.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
The commentators were talking about what Fidel Edwards's career bowling average would be if his teammates could catch. Kind of like a first-chance average for bowlers... would be interesting because at the moment his figures look very poor on the face of it.
Hmmm. :detective

Yeah, given the general arseitude of the fielding I reckon you can knock at least 5 runs off their averages for a truer reflection.

Two of the best three seamers playing in this test are West Indian IMHO.
Hardly the most original thought, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt this time.

Strongly suspect more than one meedja outlet swipes ideas off CW from time to time tho.
 

shivfan

Banned
and I wouldnt deny that being the case. Two poor teams are playing each other at the moment and if you are waiting for me to go over the top about the performance of either one of them then you might have to sit down. West Indies performance today was absolutely shocking, there is no denying that, whether you are a WI fan or not. and the same goes for England. Both teams are about even, and thats only because they are both rubbish.
There were plusses and minuses, so I would certainly not classify the entire team performances on both sides as poor....

Bopara batted well, in spite of his escapes. Edwards bowled well, and fully deserved to have his name up on the honours board. The ball he produced to dismiss KP was an excellent one!

Yes, Taylor was off-colour, but Benn bowled reasonably well too. No one is claiming that either is the new Glenn McGrath or the new Shane Warne....
:dry:
The WI fielding in the final session was appalling!

You might think England are rubbish, because they seem to be regressing. However, I feel optimistic about the WIndies, because they are improving incrementally. Do you know how many runs the WI bowlers conceded the last time they played at Lords?

Yes, the WI still have some way to go, but they have finally moved off the number eight spot, and have Pakistan - and maybe even England - in their sights!
:)
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
Hmmm. :detective



Hardly the most original thought, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt this time.

Strongly suspect more than one meedja outlet swipes ideas off CW from time to time tho.
Perhaps, but not sure TMS commentators are sufficiently internet-literate, the way they still struggle over giving out the email address as if they're speaking a foreign language. ;)
 

Top