McCrone is good enough, that was ridiculous him being dragged, its not like Tongue was ever going to do a better job.Need a halfback tbh.
We were more free-flowing last year as well. It was more the case of no one thinking we'll win, and we spread the ball out alot more. This year, it's just not happening... Losing Best was a big thing. Sure, McCrone is good, but not great, give him time to mature it'll be good.The Raiders problem is actually their structure, last year on the attack they had a deep line this year its just inside balls to the props, its not 2002 anymore this game plan isnt going to win games.
Really thought McCrone would fire up tonight considering we bought him and didn't play him in FG once.We were more free-flowing last year as well. It was more the case of no one thinking we'll win, and we spread the ball out alot more. This year, it's just not happening... Losing Best was a big thing. Sure, McCrone is good, but not great, give him time to mature it'll be good.
No, they're just not that good frankly. Lockyer and Hodges are wonderful, but Hodges was completely owned by McDougall last night - frankly made him look cod ordinary. Folau - wow, yet another 6'5" winger who can jump. Big deal. Hunt's all right. Michaels - the Hindmarsh of backs - works hard, can't bust a tackle. The forwards are good but not great IMO. Simms and Thaiday fine, Kenny unproven and Clinton will certainly go missing when it counts most. He has all career.It's been 11 years since I've felt this confident, early doors in the season, of a Broncos premiership. I knew we'd win when the comp came back together in 1998, and I can already smell the sweet aroma of premiership glory this season too.
I think the backs are good, but not necessarily the best in the comp. They strike me a bit like the league equivalents of flat track bullies - they don't much like it when someone stcks it to them.We easily have the best back line in the comp but I wouldn't say we are certainties for the title yet.
You're ****ting me aren't you? You don't think any other side in the comp will look forward to playing that line up? It's not Brisbanes fault - you can't have the depth you've had in the past these days, but that side, you would think, would lose more than it wins at Origin time.Allowing for Hunt, Lockyer, Hodges, Folau, Wallace, Thaiday and even Parker to be out.
1 Tom Hewitt
2 Antonio Winterstein
3 Steve Michaels
4 Alex Glenn
5 Jharal Yow Yeh
6 PJ Marsh
7 Ben Hunt [hopefully]
8 Nick Kenny
9 Andrew McCullough
10 Joel Clinton
11 Ashton Sims
12 Ben Teo
13 Lagi Setu
14 Dave Taylor
15 Josh McGuire
16 Palmer Wapau
17 Aaron Gorrell
Not too bad really.
It's no coincidence that PJ Marsh and Tom Hewitt have been playing at 1 and 6 recently.
DWTA, massively frankly.May cost you the minor prem, but only injuries (especially to Lockyear) or a massive loss of form will cost you the title imo. You really look a cut above this year.
Mate, the Broncos didn't cope with a Friday-following Saturday turn around this weekI think professional teams [not Eels, Sharks, Roosters] shouldn't find it too hard unless it's a Monday to Friday turn-around.
No, it's not that. I think they're a good side, but I think they idea they're streets ahead of everyone else this year isn't right.Sounds like someone has their angry pants on today.
FWIW I thought the same about the Knights.You mean Uate..
I basically said that we have the best backline in the comp, but we aren't streets ahead of anyone for the comp. I than picked our best team without our top 6 or 7 players and figured our side was still respectable but ofcourse would struggle to win that many games.
Knights played fantastic last night, I feel dirty labelling them a bottom 3 side at the start of the year.
Im pretty sure the rule is different when you are defending to attacking. As has been stated the rule was brought in to prevent players gaining an advantage in an attacking position, if you did it in defence in the situations you are probably thinking then it would more likely be in preventing a try or the chance of a try.FWIW I thought the same about the Knights.
I find them one of those sides that are compelling to watch though. I also find the Raiders the same.
Going out on a limb here, if you had to tip a smokie (that is, a team not in the top say 3 or 4 contenders) to make a run at the comp this year, who would it be? Mine would be Penrith - some explosive forwards, with Petro a solid leader and Waterhouse back to 03 form; their halves are raw I know, but they're creative and they have a few options there with Walsh on board now, and their backs with Jennings (last night's injury pending) aren't bad either. Not saying they'll win it, but I could see them going on a run and doing some big damage. Makes me feel bad saying they'd come 11th at the start of the year.
Right now, if my team finishes 11th, I'll actually be happy
Also can someone clarify a rule for me. Hayne was (rightly) penalised for knocking the ball forward on Friday night, but don't defenders do that all the time when they try to stop a pass being made to an outside man and they stick out a hand? I wonder if they'll penalise players for doing that?
Not as bad as tipping a top three of Sharks, Manly and Raiders as I did lol.Knights played fantastic last night, I feel dirty labelling them a bottom 3 side at the start of the year.