Thanks.
Back today against your lot. See county thread...A couple of things, though. Two spinners in May would be ********, and is Sidey injured? I know he hasn't looked great of late, but he averages about 26 over the last couple of eyars, worth another crack if available, surely
Problem with Sidebottom is, his first bowl since injury is today. Not sure why he couldn't have been included dependent on his fitness and make it a 13-man squad.Erm....interesting
The thing is, the selectors have done the right thing by keeping out Vaughan/Bell/Harmison. They obviously made that decision and then thoguht...what do we do now? Though my post about picking a squad of 9 or 10 was in jest, there was a ring of truth to what I was getting at, and this is validated by the selection of players who don't even stand out at county level.
A couple of things, though. Two spinners in May would be ********, and is Sidey injured? I know he hasn't looked great of late, but he averages about 26 over the last couple of eyars, worth another crack if available, surely
Back today against your lot. See county thread...
Struggling to keep up with things at the minute...if this is his first game back, probably better to assess him. If he does well then I'm sure he'll be back in the side before longProblem with Sidebottom is, his first bowl since injury is today. Not sure why he couldn't have been included dependent on his fitness and make it a 13-man squad.
Fear not, Amjad Khan is waiting in the wings.So the 6 best bowlers currently in England are: Anderson, Onions, Bresnan, Swann, Panesar and Broad.
Nope. They're: Flintoff, Anderson, Broad, Swann, Panesar and then probably Onions, although the final one's debatable.So the 6 best bowlers currently in England are: Anderson, Onions, Bresnan, Swann, Panesar and Broad.
Yeah apparently, although Amjad Kahn was one according to the selectors a few weeks ago.So the 6 best bowlers currently in England are: Anderson, Onions, Bresnan, Swann, Panesar and Broad.
tbf his second 5-for of the week suggests he's not in the worst of form. Especially at Taunton of all places.Nope. They're: Flintoff, Anderson, Broad, Swann, Panesar and then probably Onions, although the final one's debatable.
Predictable selection = good selection. Because it generally means things are easy to do.Can't say anyhting more for it than that, but at least England selectors are not quite as predictable as we thought they were. Not sure that it is really a good thing though.
TBF they didn't leave him out as such - he was merely a stand-in, so stood down. He was a sixth batsman, and in the next Test a fifth bowler was absolutely essential, so he had to go.Bopara looks a decent prospect, but nothing more despite all the hype.
I'd give him a consistent run in the side at number 5 or 6 and allow him the opportunity to adjust to test cricket...He isn't being handled very well at the moment, picking him seemingly at random in different positions and leaving him out after his first test hundred.
I might've said they should not and probably would not pick him, but I'd never, ever have said the time of someone who is no more than a year older than me had passed.Pretty sure that Bresnan is the guy that I suggested earlier this year and Richard replied that the selectors would never go for him as his time has passed.
Don't know if the search feature will allow me to find this.