I've said this countless time before, but let's look at the facts:
The Sharks side lost:
a) Their halfback, leader and one of the best players in the comp at leading a side around the park with no fuss.
b) Their Lock, who was undoubtedly one of the best locks in the NRL and so versatile it was like having an extra half on the park who alongside making 120m and making 25 tackles, could end games with 2 or even 3 try assists and good kick metres.
c) The most underrated hooker in the game in De Gois, who's creative and hardworking.
The Sharks side gained:
a) Trent Barrett. The biggest myth in Rugby League. 1 amazing game among 4 games you didn't even notice he played. Barrett is and can be a very good player, and will probably win the Sharks 3 or 4 games off his own back this season. But the rest of those games he'll contribute poorly. You're replacing Mr. Consistency with Mr. Inconsistency in the halves, and let's not forget how good Seymour was last season because he was allowed to be his own player and grow into the role of the 6 alongside a consistent performer. "Oh guess what Brett, you're back in 7, here's all the pressure and we expect you to be Brett Kimmorely for Trent Barrett now." Good job. What they conveniently forgot is that Brett was an absolute leader with experience and creative vision.
b) Anthony Topou and Reni Maitua. Great back-rowers, impact players, consistent. Creativity? Nope. Topou is a great impact player, hits the line hard, makes yardage, does the hard work. Same with Maitua. But Greg Bird did all that, and more. Neither Reni or Toops are leaders, Bird was. Neither Reni or Toops can win games by themselves and worry the opposition, Bird could. I didn't like Bird but he was a top class NRL level footballer. They may have replaced his yardage and tackles but they've neglected his leadership and creativity. Notice a pattern yet?
c) Corey Hughes. Good hard player, does the hard work. Was a good player half a decade ago. He's winding down and we can all see it, except for Ricky Stuart I guess. Hughes is a fierce competitor, tackles hard, shovels the ball well and has a decent kicking game. He lacks the spark that made him dangerous with the dogs early this century and losing De Gois's little bit of flair has hurt them as much as anyone. Credit where credit is due, he is a leader and has compensated for the above losses in that respect.
Alright, so basically. A side that struggled to score more than 20 points a game last season and had one of the best defence's going around in the competition lost 3 of their attacking weapons and replaced them with strong defensive players with little flair, and a wrong-side-of-30 player who's just as inconsistent as he was when he was 21. Top notch offy.