four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
No way, he's cute and fluffy.Are you taking the piss?
Watson on the field is a dick.
No way, he's cute and fluffy.Are you taking the piss?
Watson on the field is a dick.
That's not a good thing.Nothing more than your average 'new age' Indian cricketer
I heard there's vomit in the streets over there.Nothing more than your average 'new age' Indian cricketer
Let me know when one of those guys accuses a bowler of chucking whilst on the field.Nothing more than your average 'new age' Indian cricketer
He does look it when he's trying to act all hard when bowling.No way, he's cute and fluffy.
Haha, was just stirring, don't really care.That's not a good thing.
Anything besides baseless conjecture regarding that?Let me know when one of those guys accuses a bowler of chucking whilst on the field.
Hmm....perhaps the earlier calls were spot on based on this posting style. [/hypocrisy]I'd be worried about skin cancer, and possibility of a No.4 ranking in ODIsm if were you.
Yeah, was a brutal innings...new pakistan opener ahmed shehzad debuting tomorow.
has already smashed the saffie attack and also sri lankan attack domestically so worth sticking him into the deep end.
Cricinfo - Players and Officials - Ahmed Shehzad
He is just average no need to wet your pants.2 sixes vs that attack and that too at 16 years old?
the rest of the batting order didnt get a sniff so i would call that brutal.
you do know that a innings thats over 200 in strike rate isnt the only definition for brutal.
like hayden,
he can hit 1 6 in his innings but it will be brutal
I also know that if someone has a strike-rate of 79 and scores a mere 35 in a game where the opposition have gone over 7 runs an over, isn't particularly notable or indeed an accurate description of smashing an attack.2 sixes vs that attack and that too at 16 years old?
the rest of the batting order didnt get a sniff so i would call that brutal.
you do know that a innings thats over 200 in strike rate isnt the only definition for brutal.
like hayden,
he can hit 1 6 in his innings but it will be brutal
Gul was listed 19 on debut in 2003 and this Afridi overage issue is overstated the guy made his debut 13 years back and still looks like he can go for half a dozen years I would say he was overage by not more then a year or two.I also know that if someone has a strike-rate of 79 and scores a mere 35 in a game where the opposition have gone over 7 runs an over, isn't particularly notable or indeed an accurate description of smashing an attack.
Also, if he was 16 at the time, Afridi is 29 and the evergreen, Umar Gul is 25 (despite being 24 at the last Champions Trophy, 3 years ago)...