Pup Clarke
Cricketer Of The Year
Hiya Geoff.
Brilliant, wonderfully glib answer, tell me where I'm inaccurate?Hiya Geoff.
Hum, interesting. Do you think the West Indies would have won more games without Brian Lara?The bloke is an obnoxious ****. I really hate the talk that "without KP England would be crap", the fact is our results were better without him, he's a narcissistic fool and mercenary, terrible for team morale.
Not sure to be fair, but KP is no Brian Lara.Hum, interesting. Do you think the West Indies would have won more games without Brian Lara?
The results were better, but we had Thorpe. The only series Pietersen played which Thorpe also would have is the 05 Ashes, ie he was going to retire after them anyway. Who would you have in the side instead of him?The bloke is an obnoxious ****. I really hate the talk that "without KP England would be crap", the fact is our results were better without him, he's a narcissistic fool and mercenary, terrible for team morale.
The results were better, but we had Thorpe. The only series Pietersen played which Thorpe also would have is the 05 Ashes, ie he was going to retire after them anyway. Who would you have in the side instead of him?
The results were better before him because we had more good players than we do now. Many of those have now retired, I fail to see how you could possibly suggest he has a detrimental effect on results. Jesus, if it wasn't for him we'd have somehow contrived to lose the last Ashes 10-0.
I think you know that it doesn't really work like that. The reason England won more matches before he starting playing was because they were a better side. England's decline can in no way be put down to Pietersen. As I have said I don't think he is really an unpleasant person, just one the sometimes says stupid thing and lacks that subetldy or maybe intelligence to realise their negative impact. He is always going to stand out as an individual due to his personality and his ability but if you take his England career as a whole it is very hard to argue he has had a negative effect on team moral or results.The bloke is an obnoxious ****. I really hate the talk that "without KP England would be crap", the fact is our results were better without him, he's a narcissistic fool and mercenary, terrible for team morale.
Well, yes and no. In Pakistan yeah sure, Simon Jones was the only man missing, aside from Vaughan in one Test. And incidentally that probably was Pietersen's worst series.Don't get your points at all, because we had practically the same side before and after
Simon Jones wasn't much part of our success before, so his injury isn't relevant really.
Thorpe retired because he was ousted from the side by KP (and Bell admittedly which is horrific in retrospect). I just believe kevin's ego has been detrimental to the side, so we've performed poorer then our constituent parts, rather then better.
It's all opinion though, and yes losing 10-0 would of been awful......
I think you know that it doesn't really work like that. The reason England won more matches before he starting playing was because they were a better side. England's decline can in no way be put down to Pietersen. As I have said I don't think he is really an unpleasant person, just one the sometimes says stupid thing and lacks that subetldy or maybe intelligence to realise their negative impact. He is always going to stand out as an individual due to his personality and his ability but if you take his England career as a whole it is very hard to argue he has had a negative effect on team moral or results.
My point is that the likes of Giles, Tresco, Hoggard, Geraint Jones were better without KPs influence, so your making my point for me. Every week seems to bring a new story about Kev's disruptiveness.Well, yes and no. In Pakistan yeah sure, Simon Jones was the only man missing, aside from Vaughan in one Test. And incidentally that probably was Pietersen's worst series.
From then on though - we were without Vaughan & Tresco in India, and they never played in the same side again. We never fielded the same pace attack, Flintoff has been in and out side, Giles went into decline, Geraint Jones went by the wayside. So really, the core of the Ashes team never really played again after Pakistan.
Well if it's a direct quote, unaltered, then they havent really done much but tell me, have they? It's not like they are adding a biased opinion to itNewspapers just print such articles to generate the sort of reactions and outrage that Langeveldt exhibited. Criticising KP is currently flavour of the month.
I think KP treated the whole thing with contempt.. You do realize that he made his ultimatum via SMS when on safari?I feel KP was treated very shabbily by the ECB, and the thought of a chat to KP and sensible explanation by someone important at the ECB is obviously beyond rational thinking. It's disappointing that the ECB have caused more problems than found solutions.
As regards KP's comments about it being a long tour, wanting to get home and missing his wife ? Why is this news ? All the squad have probably thought/said this, but with KP it's always a bigger story.
Is he selfish and does he disrupt the squad ? I think he has immense determination to succeed and fulfil all his ambitions of scoring runs and becoming the greatest batsman in the world, if he does that, then surely it will benefit the England side. His detrimental effect on the squad I'm not 100% sure about, he talks a lot about himself and what he can become, that's just focus, not selfish. He may upset players at times because he wants to be in the best side, he cannot accept mediocrity.
You don't. And the fact that you don't give a toss means you have precisely zero right to preach to other people that they should feel the way you do. Some people's loved ones mean more to them than other people's loved ones; some people absolutely detest being apart from their loved ones, while others don't mind so much.I haven’t seen my family in over nine months. Who gives a toss?
Yeah, that's right, England would've won at Lord's had someone other than him been fielding.Before you mention the Ashes I'd say without him being such a lousy catcher, we wouldn't of needed a draw at the Oval.
****, where am I preaching?You don't. And the fact that you don't give a toss means you have precisely zero right to preach to other people that they should feel the way you do. Some people's loved ones mean more to them than other people's loved ones; some people absolutely detest being apart from their loved ones, while others don't mind so much.
No, Thorpe retired because he was 35, had an increasingly weakening back and no-one can go on forever. Thorpe was never, under any circumstance, going to play beyond the 2005 summer. He signed a coaching contract in Australia before the series against Bangladesh.Thorpe retired because he was ousted from the side by KP (and Bell admittedly which is horrific in retrospect).
By intimating "who gives a toss about not seeing family", which you are by saying "I haven’t seen my family in over nine months. Who gives a toss?".****, where am I preaching?