TT Boy
Hall of Fame Member
I like the logic and with that, Tim McIntosh has done very poorly in two consecutive games so the chances of him scoring in the next game increases. Beware.Your probability work never ceases to amaze me, ret.
I like the logic and with that, Tim McIntosh has done very poorly in two consecutive games so the chances of him scoring in the next game increases. Beware.Your probability work never ceases to amaze me, ret.
I actually had a lengthy debate with Ret about it once. He honestly believes that if you're flipping a coin and get two tails in a row, the chance of the third one being a tail is less than 50%. He fails to see that was has gone has gone and there's no cosmic evening out.I like the logic and with that, Tim McIntosh has done very poorly in two consecutive games so the chances of him scoring in the next game increases. Beware.
Happens all the time. I don't hold with this uncertainty nonsense. I reckon Schrodinger had two boxes and an indeterminate number of cats.For there to be "evening out", the coin would have to 'know' what went before and adjust itself mid-air accordingly.....
Precisely.For there to be "evening out", the coin would have to 'know' what went before and adjust itself mid-air accordingly.....
Patel is penetrative. Had the pitch assisted him more and had Indians not been good players of spin bowling, he would have had a bagful of wickets.Well anyone would, Vettori isn't penetrative - same goes for most finger spinners including Patel.
Two too many ifs for my liking. But these flat pitches really do rather annoy me.Patel is penetrative. Had the pitch assisted him more and had Indians not been good players of spin bowling, he would have had a bagful of wickets.
Shocked he never got done for cruelty to animals, tbh.Happens all the time. I don't hold with this uncertainty nonsense. I reckon Schrodinger had two boxes and an indeterminate number of cats.
My parrots wouldn't be out of place in this thread. They're always fighting about nothing (or what I assume to be nothing as they could only be fighting over the choicest bit of seed or the best perch). They had a fight yesterday and Ambrose ended up with a bloody nose. Not good.Basically I concur with Heath, which I generally always do. I could be his parrot.
(Ambrose is now having to wear a passport sized photo of "Runako Morton - Test Class" round his neck as Lara beat him in a fight)
If that were true, wouldn't probability be an extinct concept?!!For there to be "evening out", the coin would have to 'know' what went before and adjust itself mid-air accordingly.....
Really? Dammit, I wish I'd been there.I actually had a lengthy debate with Ret about it once. He honestly believes that if you're flipping a coin and get two tails in a row, the chance of the third one being a tail is less than 50%. He fails to see that was has gone has gone and there's no cosmic evening out.
It sounds like easy meat in theory, but you really didn't want to be there - his twisted logic was just too twisted to actually crack. I can't believe I wasted as much time on it as I did.. although I was at work at the time, so I guess that explains it..Really? Dammit, I wish I'd been there.
Ah, I see I finished him off. I blame my workload for my forgetting.Actually, you were there for it, Neil.
Haha the post he's responding to has left my brain in a knot.Actually, you were there for it, Neil.