• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in West Indies

gvenkat

State Captain
I agree, that's got the bottom of the middle and index fingers - but on the TV replay with the foreshortening effect, you just cannot give that out.

For the record, and before anyone mentions anything, the third umpire is West Indian.
And he didnt see flintoff stamping the rope earlier.. so no reason to give this out...
 

gvenkat

State Captain
Not convinced... sometimes I saw a ripple, sometimes not - depended where and when you were focusing on what.

Incidentally, am I the only one who still thinks we're highly likely to jib this?
unless england do a westindies here and collapse.. i dont see them losing this...
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
England are so unbelievably dire against dobber bowling.

Anyway I do agree that 135 off 20 is easier than 240 off 50. I think about 145-155 would have been about right.

I'd say 250-300 is par for 50 overs on a standard limited overs track and 160-180 for 20 overs.
 

Evermind

International Debutant
WI RR: 4.60

Eng RRR: 6.75

How's that easy? 47% more runs PER OVER. More than makes up for the 10-wicket advantage IMO.
 

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
What's going on? We might win a game? Was watching Ecuador-Brazil, then realised there might be a possibility of the cricket being back on.
 

Top