• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Does Rohit Sharma Deserve his place in the indian 20/20 side?

R sharma in the t20 side?


  • Total voters
    14

IndGunner

First Class Debutant
Just am curious what other people think of rohit sharma in the t20 side?

Personally i dont think he belongs there would prefer to see an Uthappa or someone like that in the side
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Let's just keep this tiny issue to the official thread shall we? It's no issue at all.
 

adharcric

International Coach
He deserves a few more matches in the Twenty20 side, yes. However, we need to explore other options in the one-day side if he continues to disappoint.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
There's a far bigger issue here- have Indians forgotten how to bat in T20? We've seen them play recklessly when they've barely scored two runs, and they've all got out cheaply. They've all lacked temperament, and this has happened in the last two matches including this one. They're trying to hit a six off every ball, ignoring the value of the big innings.
 

IndGunner

First Class Debutant
There's a far bigger issue here- have Indians forgotten how to bat in T20? We've seen them play recklessly when they've barely scored two runs, and they've all got out cheaply. They've all lacked temperament, and this has happened in the last two matches including this one. They're trying to hit a six off every ball, ignoring the value of the big innings.
thankfully raina had his head screwed in and i think dhoni got a decnt ball and yuvi needs to get some practise against the slower bowlers
 

masterblaster

International Captain
Rohit hasn't really done much to stake his claim in this Indian side in T20's or in ODI's. Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa would be feeling pretty good about their chances of making a comeback into the Indian XI.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Rohit hasn't really done much to stake his claim in this Indian side in T20's or in ODI's. Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa would be feeling pretty good about their chances of making a comeback into the Indian XI.
Yeah, I'd recall Uthappa to the T20 squad and Kohli to the ODI side unless things change dramatically for Sharma over the course of this series.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
bad display from india there with the bowl maybe even drop rohit for another bowler?
more than 160 is decent enough in t20, you are right that it is the bowling that was pathetic today...Yusuf Pathan is a trash bowler in any form of the game...
 

CDAK

U19 Debutant
.Yusuf Pathan is a trash bowler in any form of the game...
Not always. He did well in IPLs, last T20 against SL and in a few ODIs too.
Just one bad game.
Then what about much-hyped Ishant Sharma?

On Rohit:
He is the best technically correct youngster (cricketer) with exceptional attacking capability, now available with Team India. ViratKohli, Badrinath etc are craps..
 

masterblaster

International Captain
Not always. He did well in IPLs, last T20 against SL and in a few ODIs too.
Just one bad game.
Then what about much-hyped Ishant Sharma?

On Rohit:
He is the best technically correct youngster (cricketer) with exceptional attacking capability, now available with Team India. ViratKohli, Badrinath etc are craps..
Nope, Badrinath is far more technically correct than Rohit Sharma. Compare Badrinath's FC average of around 56 to Rohit's average of around 38 and you'll know the difference. Rohit maybe very talented and would probably be the better limited overs player, but he definitely hasn't proved anything at the First Class level or in ODI's and T20's for India.

Any more failures and his position would come under real scrutiny. They won't replace him with Badrinath because they don't pick him, but Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa are certain replacements if Rohit Sharma continues to perform poorly.
 

bryce

International Regular
Uthappa isn't much of a T20 player IMO, someone like Dhawan seems like a much more attractive option in both T20 and 50 over cricket
 

CDAK

U19 Debutant
Nope, Badrinath is far more technically correct than Rohit Sharma. Compare Badrinath's FC average of around 56 to Rohit's average of around 38 and you'll know the difference. Rohit maybe very talented and would probably be the better limited overs player, but he definitely hasn't proved anything at the First Class level or in ODI's and T20's for India.

Any more failures and his position would come under real scrutiny. They won't replace him with Badrinath because they don't pick him, but Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa are certain replacements if Rohit Sharma continues to perform poorly.
First Class Average of Badrinath> FCA of YUVI
FCA of Badrinath>FCA of Dhoni
FCAof Wasim Jafeer>> Badrinath> FCA of YUVI

Does that mean, he(badri) is better than Yuvi?
Badrinath is just a Renji-level player, and he lacks the genuine-skills which is a bonus for an International player.He might be a hard worker like siddu,Dravid, saurav, dhoni,kumble etc, but R'Sharma is a natural-talent (or genuinely skilled) like Vishwanath,Azhar, Kapil,Sachin,Sehwag,VVS, Yuvraj etc and he will just get better with more and more exposure. As they say,"form is temporary,but class is permanent"
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
There's no point arguing about one or two players supposedly not good enough. The whole team, especially the best players, are desperately struggling for form, and that needs to be addressed. This is not a time to keep dropping and chopping; it's counterproductive. We don't see questions raised about Kiwi selections too often; they've settled with their best team, and they're doing well with those players. They need to go back to the drawing board and look to change the way they play, and a change in personnel will take the team backwards.
 

masterblaster

International Captain
First Class Average of Badrinath> FCA of YUVI
FCA of Badrinath>FCA of Dhoni
FCAof Wasim Jafeer>> Badrinath> FCA of YUVI

Does that mean, he(badri) is better than Yuvi?
Badrinath is just a Renji-level player, and he lacks the genuine-skills which is a bonus for an International player.He might be a hard worker like siddu,Dravid, saurav, dhoni,kumble etc, but R'Sharma is a natural-talent (or genuinely skilled) like Vishwanath,Azhar, Kapil,Sachin,Sehwag,VVS, Yuvraj etc and he will just get better with more and more exposure. As they say,"form is temporary,but class is permanent"
You stated that Rohit Sharma is more technically correct than Badrinath, to which I replied as it's not a correct statement at all.

Also has Badrinath really been given a decent chance at International level? How do you know he is just a 'Ranji Level Player'? As far as I'm aware, he's been the leading run getter for India A against many other International A sides comprising of players who are now currently playing for their national teams.

If he's given a chance, I think he would do fine. But has he really been given a fair shake at international level?

The answer is no.
 

Top