What he said.I used to think so. Seems to have gone backwards a lot lately though.
thankfully raina had his head screwed in and i think dhoni got a decnt ball and yuvi needs to get some practise against the slower bowlersThere's a far bigger issue here- have Indians forgotten how to bat in T20? We've seen them play recklessly when they've barely scored two runs, and they've all got out cheaply. They've all lacked temperament, and this has happened in the last two matches including this one. They're trying to hit a six off every ball, ignoring the value of the big innings.
Yeah, I'd recall Uthappa to the T20 squad and Kohli to the ODI side unless things change dramatically for Sharma over the course of this series.Rohit hasn't really done much to stake his claim in this Indian side in T20's or in ODI's. Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa would be feeling pretty good about their chances of making a comeback into the Indian XI.
more than 160 is decent enough in t20, you are right that it is the bowling that was pathetic today...Yusuf Pathan is a trash bowler in any form of the game...bad display from india there with the bowl maybe even drop rohit for another bowler?
Not always. He did well in IPLs, last T20 against SL and in a few ODIs too..Yusuf Pathan is a trash bowler in any form of the game...
Nope, Badrinath is far more technically correct than Rohit Sharma. Compare Badrinath's FC average of around 56 to Rohit's average of around 38 and you'll know the difference. Rohit maybe very talented and would probably be the better limited overs player, but he definitely hasn't proved anything at the First Class level or in ODI's and T20's for India.Not always. He did well in IPLs, last T20 against SL and in a few ODIs too.
Just one bad game.
Then what about much-hyped Ishant Sharma?
On Rohit:
He is the best technically correct youngster (cricketer) with exceptional attacking capability, now available with Team India. ViratKohli, Badrinath etc are craps..
First Class Average of Badrinath> FCA of YUVINope, Badrinath is far more technically correct than Rohit Sharma. Compare Badrinath's FC average of around 56 to Rohit's average of around 38 and you'll know the difference. Rohit maybe very talented and would probably be the better limited overs player, but he definitely hasn't proved anything at the First Class level or in ODI's and T20's for India.
Any more failures and his position would come under real scrutiny. They won't replace him with Badrinath because they don't pick him, but Virat Kohli and Robin Uthappa are certain replacements if Rohit Sharma continues to perform poorly.
You stated that Rohit Sharma is more technically correct than Badrinath, to which I replied as it's not a correct statement at all.First Class Average of Badrinath> FCA of YUVI
FCA of Badrinath>FCA of Dhoni
FCAof Wasim Jafeer>> Badrinath> FCA of YUVI
Does that mean, he(badri) is better than Yuvi?
Badrinath is just a Renji-level player, and he lacks the genuine-skills which is a bonus for an International player.He might be a hard worker like siddu,Dravid, saurav, dhoni,kumble etc, but R'Sharma is a natural-talent (or genuinely skilled) like Vishwanath,Azhar, Kapil,Sachin,Sehwag,VVS, Yuvraj etc and he will just get better with more and more exposure. As they say,"form is temporary,but class is permanent"