Athlai
Not Terrible
That was 3 matches. This series is the first ever 5 match CH.Hmm, trying to think of them. There was a 5 match CH series that Hussey captained but where else did he sit out?
That was 3 matches. This series is the first ever 5 match CH.Hmm, trying to think of them. There was a 5 match CH series that Hussey captained but where else did he sit out?
He's actually 24, but oh well.
Have to admit I thought it would have been higher than that.Ponting has played NZ 41 times in ODI's and in that time he has missed 12 matches.
Then why not stop playing in such meaningless matches, and devote entire time for tests?
Sane selectors in Australia, that's certainly news to me...As the captain, he should have communicated that "This is my team, no way they are going to play out of this mire without my leadership". I don;t think any sane selector would say no to that.
Assuming that there'd be a few games he missed as part of rotation policy during tri series.That was 3 matches. This series is the first ever 5 match CH.
Ah, then where else did he sit out? It's a pretty significant figure for one opponent.That was 3 matches. This series is the first ever 5 match CH.
Then the CA idiots have proved to total wankers.I repeat once again, the selectors rested him. You can write out all the fictional monologues you want, fact is humans need rest. Your last paragraph has no relevance since Ponting had no say in the matter. If Ponting did have enough clout among the selectors to sway tham, Symonds would have been on the plane to SA.
How true is that though? I mean, more people show up or tune in to watch an ODI than a test, and I'm sure they all enjoy it. I do, too. But what if you asked a random cricket fan ahead of a series: would you rather your country win the tests or the ODIs? Don't you think the majority would take the tests?
- People like Uppercut represent a very small percentage of cricket audiences; there's still a big demand for ODIs.
I know a lot of people who don't give a damn about Tests yet follow ODI's.How true is that though? I mean, more people show up or tune in to watch an ODI than a test, and I'm sure they all enjoy it. I do, too. But what if you asked a random cricket fan ahead of a series: would you rather your country win the tests or the ODIs? Don't you think the majority would take the tests?
Nah, even here which is regarded as a "Test loving country" I know loads and loads of people who only get into cricket when they get the colours on.How true is that though? I mean, more people show up or tune in to watch an ODI than a test, and I'm sure they all enjoy it. I do, too. But what if you asked a random cricket fan ahead of a series: would you rather your country win the tests or the ODIs? Don't you think the majority would take the tests?
Sorry I didnt clarify I was telling from a veteran like Ponting's pov.
- ODIs raise money for Tests.
- ODIs allow for World Cups.
- ODIs allow youngsters to get international experience in less meaningful games before being exposed to Tests (in cases where talent in a player exists for both forms).
- People like Uppercut represent a very small percentage of cricket audiences; there's still a big demand for ODIs.
as I say, mate, he can be unsure if whether his gloves hit the stumps but there is a big difference when you take a ball with zero deflection than one that is obviously going to be deflected (when it hits the stumps)... You really have to be a pretty poor keeper if you don't know the difference of how it hits the hands when it has and hasn't hit the stumps....That's rubbish...which is the bit you keep saying I have a problem with. He obviously didn't know for sure given his reaction afterwards. Your assumptions as to what he should or shouldn't have known are a bit silly. I agree he couldn't have been 100% certain it hit the stumps...said that before too.
I haven't caught up on his diatribe yet...or are you talking about his response?
Oh, and I don't think it was cheating or gamesmanship...
Depends where you ask it, In India for example, the answer will be ODIs.How true is that though? I mean, more people show up or tune in to watch an ODI than a test, and I'm sure they all enjoy it. I do, too. But what if you asked a random cricket fan ahead of a series: would you rather your country win the tests or the ODIs? Don't you think the majority would take the tests?
I don't doubt that. I do doubt that the percentage of cricket-watchers who don't take ODIs very seriously (and this is different to just "not as seriously as Tests") would be very high at all, though. I'd be surprised if it hit double figures, TBH.How true is that though? I mean, more people show up or tune in to watch an ODI than a test, and I'm sure they all enjoy it. I do, too. But what if you asked a random cricket fan ahead of a series: would you rather your country win the tests or the ODIs? Don't you think the majority would take the tests?
Reading through the lines <note dangerous thing to do if you are Australian> But you are questioning how much fight/fire in the belly does he have right now. I can imagine it would take an army to stop Steve Waugh from leading the side in the current situation but then a lesson learnt is when he almost ruined his career by playing with a damaged calf in the Ashes and made a ton on one leg.At times like these, it is the captain who should show up and take up the responsibility instead of hiding behind vague strain excuses and demoralising the team further.
Look in the trophy cabinet! 3 ODI WC's baby!Then the CA idiots have proved to total wankers.
The difference was that there was genuine injury for Waugh, in Ponting;s case there is nothing (CA should get some coaching from us in that) .Reading through the lines <note dangerous thing to do if you are Australian> But you are questioning how much fight/fire in the belly does he have right now. I can imagine it would take an army to stop Steve Waugh from leading the side in the current situation but then a lesson learnt is when he almost ruined his career by playing with a damaged calf in the Ashes and made a ton on one leg.
So your only beef with them is that they rested him for only part of the series instead of an entire series?Then the CA idiots have proved to total wankers.
Richard said:How untidy to play half of a two-legged series and not the other half.