Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah he's awesome with the new ball. He started the trend of tearing the Aussie batting lineup apart in ODIs.Praveen Kumar seems pretty crap TBH.
Nah he's awesome with the new ball. He started the trend of tearing the Aussie batting lineup apart in ODIs.Praveen Kumar seems pretty crap TBH.
Unless it was being played in EnglandYea, since WC is in the subcontinent, India would be the favorites (if it was played right now). Outside, SA would be the favorites.
NZ>England in EnglandUnless it was being played in England
Based on the last 6 months ....
India >>>> England >>> SA >> Aus
maybe.
Dilshan just had a massive slog, basically. It wasn't a bad ball by any stretch but it wasn't something you'd normally expect to take a wicket.Gah missed Zak's wicket. Was it a good ball or just Dilshan throwing everything at it?
Decent slower one but mainly the latter.Gah missed Zak's wicket. Was it a good ball or just Dilshan throwing everything at it?
forgot about that tbh.NZ>England in England
Ian Healy?Praveen Kumar seems pretty crap TBH.
I think we've long since established that Glenn McGrath was better than Ian Butler and Mohammad Sami. The fact that Fernando is crap is not a startling revelation.Here's something to think about. The fastest bowler by a long margin is Dilhara Fernando, but he's bowling loose, all over, over-stepping and somehow not too smart. On the other hand, you have Praveen Kumar or Zaheer Khan, who's bowling slow, but tight, moving the ball well, and also getting wickets, but good deliveries get hit for fours and sixes on flat wickets. What would you choose?
Zaheer and Praveen, because they're both obviously better bowlers than Fernando- more threatening, more economical.Here's something to think about. The fastest bowler by a long margin is Dilhara Fernando, but he's bowling loose, all over, over-stepping and somehow not too smart. On the other hand, you have Praveen Kumar or Zaheer Khan, who's bowling slow, but tight, moving the ball well, and also getting wickets, but good deliveries get hit for fours and sixes on flat wickets. What would you choose?
Selective memoryforgot about that tbh.
The bowlers who get to bowl with 363 runs in the bank. They're not comparable situations.Here's something to think about. The fastest bowler by a long margin is Dilhara Fernando, but he's bowling loose, all over, over-stepping and somehow not too smart. On the other hand, you have Praveen Kumar or Zaheer Khan, who's bowling slow, but tight, moving the ball well, and also getting wickets, but good deliveries get hit for fours and sixes on flat wickets. What would you choose?
Only in that they are expected to play similar roles. The quality of the two is obviously vastly different. Hell, I just compared Glenn McGrath to Praveen Kumar by your logic.Did somebody just compare Lee to Fernando?
But Lee is an accurate quick who bowls faster than Fernando. Kumar gets less bounce, less movement and is less accurate than pigeon. Incomparable I say.Only in that they are expected to play similar roles. The quality of the two is obviously vastly different. Hell, I just compared Glenn McGrath to Praveen Kumar by your logic.
Is he bad because his quick? No, he's bad because he's ****.Here's something to think about. The fastest bowler by a long margin is Dilhara Fernando, but he's bowling loose, all over, over-stepping and somehow not too smart. On the other hand, you have Praveen Kumar or Zaheer Khan, who's bowling slow, but tight, moving the ball well, and also getting wickets, but good deliveries get hit for fours and sixes on flat wickets. What would you choose?