KiWiNiNjA
International Coach
ThisYeah hopefully they won't leave it for too late, like the Adelaide ODI, and tbh there is case of using it in another 4 or 5 overs time, and inject some momentum into the innings.
ThisYeah hopefully they won't leave it for too late, like the Adelaide ODI, and tbh there is case of using it in another 4 or 5 overs time, and inject some momentum into the innings.
Yep, one of my favourites.Hey, other mods, anyone else love the term 'forum atmosphere'?
I was not active then, so I don't know.Yeah, because we never banned bond21 for aggressive trolling.
Simple. Virtually every post of his is trolling. And every discussion with him degenerates into some post or the other berating India/Indian fans, even if it is totally out of context. And while any other person would have atleast got a warning for such posts, this guy cooly gets away with such stuff.What are you saying?
He was supporting Australian cricket, and did not fit in the stereotype of an Aussie fan.Or Ernest.
Was always under the impression it was the batsmen but wouldn't mind this clarified by someone who knows?And btw do the batsmen out in the middle decide when to take the batting powerplay, or does the captain communicate with umpire or his players to employ it.
I'm starting to wonder if it might be worth it.I reckon I could prove the multiple accounts if I wanted to spend hours and hours doing so, too.
Perhaps you shouldn't throw around accusations of bias and favourtism in the moderator ranks if you aren't aware of recent forum history.I was not active then, so I don't know.
Why not? I am not talking as if I was moderator of this forum. I have done stuff in the past which embarassed me as well as others, for which I apologised and copped a ban. So I served out the punishment.Oh wait, you aren't a moderator. And your history means you can't really talk on this subject.
I'd be careful if I was you.
So... he was an Aussie then? You're agreeing?He was supporting Australian cricket, and did not fit in the stereotype of an Aussie fan.
Yeah poor form indeed by Precam to question the integrity of the mods, but mate what's with that avatar, its horrible, avatar bet??Yeah, because we never banned bond21 for aggressive trolling.
If you want to report the post, then report it and don't bother making accusations on the forum itself which hijack discussion.Why not? I am not talking as if I was moderator of this forum. I have done stuff in the past which embarassed me as well as others, for which I apologised and copped a ban. So I served out the punishment.
However, how can you deem I am not "qualified" to report stuff I deem not conducive or inflammatory?
Anyway, I wish not turn this thread into a rant thread. I wanted to register my deepest concern for a member getting away with such trolling posts.
Report function, use it.Why not? I am not talking as if I was moderator of this forum. I have done stuff in the past which embarassed me as well as others, for which I apologised and copped a ban. So I served out the punishment.
However, how can you deem I am not "qualified" to report stuff I deem not conducive or inflammatory?
Anyway, I wish not turn this thread into a rant thread. I wanted to register my deepest concern for a member getting away with such trolling posts.
He does. A lot. So did susudear, funnily enough.Report function, use it.
Excuse me for my ignorance. But having a history of banning Bond21, does not explain Social not getting a warning, does it?Perhaps you shouldn't throw around accusations of bias and favourtism in the moderator ranks if you aren't aware of recent forum history.
Agreed.Need the powerplay now IMO.
I was responding to implication that Social hasn't been banned purely because he is Australian, by pointing out that we have banned an Australian for exactly the issue you're talking about. The specific case doesn't really interest me much because you're calling for someone to be banned based on the fact that they got the rules wrong which is too ridiculous to bother with; you dragged me in by indirectly accusing the moderators of being biased with the "Oh wait, he's Aussie" comment. I don't really appreciate that and I've replied accordingly.Excuse me for my ignorance. But having a history of banning Bond21, does not explain Social not getting a warning, does it?