• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Sri Lanka In Pakistan

Precambrian

Banned
One dayers are pretty set imo with Malinga, Thurshara and Kulasekera the likely seamers. With Maharoof coming in when Malinga needs a rest. I think they will back Thurshara to bat at 7.

Tests it really it really could be anyone. Thurshara and Kulasekera haven't found their feet in that form. Malinga has strugged recently due to not being full fit, as had Dilhara for his whole career. I think they may go with Maharoof, Malinga and Dilhara and work on Prasad as the next best option.

I hope we use Malinga sparingly in ODIs and let in concentrate in Tests. As I feel we have enough options in ODIs, but a little short in Tests.
Don't agree. Mendis can do one hell of a job especially if he has a reasonably good target to defend, in ODIs. I think it's high time SL gave a break to Murali in ODIs. I guess Murali himself will retire from ODIs as soon as he breaks Akram's record. Having both Murali and Mendis in the ODI side is a tad unbalanced especially outside the subcontinent in ODIs.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Don't agree. Mendis can do one hell of a job especially if he has a reasonably good target to defend, in ODIs. I think it's high time SL gave a break to Murali in ODIs. I guess Murali himself will retire from ODIs as soon as he breaks Akram's record. Having both Murali and Mendis in the ODI side is a tad unbalanced especially outside the subcontinent in ODIs.
Well yeah that should also be part of the plan, but I would bring in Matthews overseas if you want to sure up the batting and have the extra bowling options. In the sub continent it could be a good chance to groom a 2nd spinner and Mendis' former U19 partner Senanayake. Your not going to lose much with the bat, as he is an all rounder.
 

Precambrian

Banned
I was reminded from looking at the scorecard: whatever happened to Vinod Kambli? The guy averaged 54.20 with 4 centuries from 17 games.
Averaged in the 20s in the last two years of his 3 year long test career.

Add to that indiscipline and other Symondisms.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Well yeah that should also be part of the plan, but I would bring in Matthews overseas if you want to sure up the batting and have the extra bowling options. In the sub continent it could be a good chance to groom a 2nd spinner and Mendis' former U19 partner Senanayake. Your not going to lose much with the bat, as he is an all rounder.
What a name! Senanayake! Have to admit I havent heard much about him.

Mathews should be groomed. He has the talent, and should be given a fair run.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Don't agree. Mendis can do one hell of a job especially if he has a reasonably good target to defend, in ODIs. I think it's high time SL gave a break to Murali in ODIs. I guess Murali himself will retire from ODIs as soon as he breaks Akram's record. Having both Murali and Mendis in the ODI side is a tad unbalanced especially outside the subcontinent in ODIs.
Wants to hang around until the 2011 WC. I don't think having one great spinner and an awesome talent unbalances the side in ODI cricket. Most sides send down at least 15 plus overs of spin every game regardless of conditions, the only difference with Sri Lanka is that it's two champions doing it, not one 'real' bowler and some Mickey Mouse guy sending down a few overs here and there.

Important though given the composition of the side that the likes of Mirando and Kulasekera keep working on their batting. Although Murali now calls himself an all-rounder after his recent batting heroics. :)
 

Precambrian

Banned
Maybe, but that won't be in the best interests of SL cricket in the longer run. Because Murali is not exactly spring chicken at 36, and SL plays far too many ODIs like the typical subcontinental team. Considering WC 11 is in the subcontinent, both can play without compromising much on the balance, however I feel the burden could be severe on Murali's shoulder and can backfire.

Besides, playing sole spinner in Mendis would make him more accustomed to life without Murali in the ranks and develop the bowling leadership in him.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Murali will make it past the 2011 World Cup and team up with Mendis to dominate Test cricket for the next 4-5 years imo.
 

StumpMic

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
What a name! Senanayake! Have to admit I havent heard much about him.

Mathews should be groomed. He has the talent, and should be given a fair run.
sen = "e" as in sell

na = "a" as in among

nayake = first "a" as in Ah right!
second "a" as in among
"e" as "a" in among
 

JBH001

International Regular
Wants to hang around until the 2011 WC. I don't think having one great spinner and an awesome talent unbalances the side in ODI cricket. Most sides send down at least 15 plus overs of spin every game regardless of conditions, the only difference with Sri Lanka is that it's two champions doing it, not one 'real' bowler and some Mickey Mouse guy sending down a few overs here and there.
Yes. He said as much in the post match interview but he seems to change his mind quite a bit. It is a bit odd, because in that same interview, he was asked (by Russell Arnold) whether he was aiming for 600 ODI wickets. He laughed and said that was unlikely as he would likely be unable to walk if he achieved that (a fair call considering the number of overs he has sent down since 1992). But after that, he said he would like to make it to the 2011 WC after which he would walk away from the game. Given the number of ODI matches being played these days (although I dont know SL's schedule) I think there might be good grounds for Murali getting pretty close to 600 ODI wickets by 2011 - especially if he keeps taking them at his career rate of 1.5 wickets/ODI.

If he does make it to 2011, it would be one hell of a feat of longevity. Frankly I dont know if his shoulder is upto it. If he does seriously plan on doing so, and he does not care about 600 ODI wickets, then I hope he eases off from playing minor teams, and lesser tournaments, and paces himself properly to 2011. It would be wonderful to see him go on for 20 years, and sign off on a high, especially if he is able to maintain a high standard until the very end.
 

Lostman

State Captain
God bless committee's.
Seriously this needs a wtf on it. So the Pakistan cricket board couldn't watch the game for 7 hours, and I guess they couldn't even watch a one hour highlight package of it, so they decide they want a power point on it.
I'm assuming its a pp, since I don't think they would want to read a written report.

As I have said before, I really like the PCB, since no one else can constantly make the SLC look good.:laugh:
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
I think I've figured out why theres such a backlog in the judicial system in India and Pakistan. the judges are too busy participating in fact finding committees.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
It would be a complement to consider that this Pakistan side could chuck a game. They are poor (few cricketers aside) and that could be written on a post-it note as the PCB’s report.
 
It would be a complement to consider that this Pakistan side could chuck a game. They are poor (few cricketers aside) and that could be written on a post-it note as the PCB’s report.
This is laughable seriously, i think you should see the highlights of the last two ODIs of the series. They were clearly outplayed, i cannot believed people actually considered the series was fixed. Maybe Afridi because he exposed the stumps to Kulasekara, i'm sure he accumulated some spare ruppees from his grandmother 8-)
 
Last edited:

Mahindinho

State Vice-Captain
To think that "they were clearly outplayed" proves that it's no fix is, well, a bit naive. Cricket is a very easy game to fix. Dropping catches, fumbling pick-ups, bowling badly, choosing your shots poorly...it'd be easy to be shoddy and not look like you're throwing the game. The SL team wouldn't even realise it.

I also doubt that anyone would view the SLCB as a source of bribes! Instead, it's the dodgy bookies and gamblers who might try to finance this sort of thing. An away win typically nets them much more cash.

Not that I'm suggesting for a moment that the series was fixed. SL and Pak are two of the most inconsistent outifts in world cricket. Both are capable of beating ANYONE* one day and no-one the next. Pak had one good day to SL's two. And the board should just deal with it.

* Gilchrist and his magic squash ball notwithstanding :(

You know what really grinds my cricketing gears? All this "we've lost so let's have an inquest" malarkey. It's sport. Defeats happen. Nobody has the god-given right to win. Grrrrrrrrr!
 
To think that "they were clearly outplayed" proves that it's no fix is, well, a bit naive. Cricket is a very easy game to fix. Dropping catches, fumbling pick-ups, bowling badly, choosing your shots poorly...it'd be easy to be shoddy and not look like you're throwing the game. The SL team wouldn't even realise it.
There were two dropped catches early in the SL innings but they were very tough. The only auspicious chance was the Akmal missed stumping off Kandamby, which looked pretty easy. The only poor shots was really from Khurram and Afridi but that was a blinder of a catch from Maharoof and Afridi is Afridi. I'm just analyzing the 3rd ODI but i do agree with you to an extent.
 

Top