Probably was a bit harsh on him but being slightly annoyed at how he got influenced that.Think this Guptill-bashing is a little bit mean-spirited. Can't we be excited that a young guy has scored a ton on his debut?
ODI centuries aren't really in abundance for us - the most any NZ batsman has managed is 16. So it's pretty awesome that a really promising player has started off with one IMO.
Yeah, but I remember back then he was talked up a lot.TBF to him, he did his job more often than not in ODIs. Would be gun in Twenty20s if he decides to come back.
Agreed 100%. The ICC should definitely consider having the same sort of concept as the max zones. It may not be traditional cricket, but it encourages the batsmen to hit straight.Cricket Max >>> Twenty20
35 from 6 and then smashed the last ball past the bowler for 8.It was from 6 balls I thought.
No of course it would count.with the game being rained out does this mean Guptills score doesn't count?
That would blow goats!
with the game being rained out does this mean Guptills score doesn't count?
That would blow goats!
Yep, it counts guys. Even if 1 ball is bowled in a match and then it's a wash out, averages still count.Haha, that would suck. Think it counts though.
Yeah I agree totally, makes it far more interesting. I see the "Free Hit" rule was in Cricket Max, so the ICC probably got that idea from there. Perhaps they can take the Max idea tooAgreed 100%. The ICC should definitely consider having the same sort of concept as the max zones. It may not be traditional cricket, but it encourages the batsmen to hit straight.
35 from 6 and then smashed the last ball past the bowler for 8.
Agree with that. Flynn has good stats at one day domestic level with a strike rate of 90 or so but in internationals he just hasn't even gotten started. Feel sorry for the guy. Hope he doesn't get pigeon holed just as a test player because I don't think he is. I agree that he seems like he needs to bat further up to give him time to bat through the innings, rather than come in and try and play a short hit from the outset kinda innings.It would be difficult to drop Guptil after this knock. It was very good.
I would rather Ryder return and open with Guptil with McCullum dropping down to the middle order. If Fynn is to continue playing, and I think he may turn into a decent ODI batsman, then it should be at 3. Some time in the ODI team may also help his scoring in tests (although I think he does have the shots for both forms of the game).
Anyway, I would prefer the following:
1. Guptil
2. Ryder
3. Flynn
4. Taylor
5. McCullum
6. Broom
7. Elliott.
8. Vettori
9. Mills.
and two more out of Southee, O'Brien, Martin, Patel etc.
Strange to discard a guy averaging 66.30 with the bat in 4 attempts, with those being aAgree with that. Flynn has good stats at one day domestic level with a strike rate of 90 or so but in internationals he just hasn't even gotten started. Feel sorry for the guy. Hope he doesn't get pigeon holed just as a test player because I don't think he is. I agree that he seems like he needs to bat further up to give him time to bat through the innings, rather than come in and try and play a short hit from the outset kinda innings.
The problem with that is Ryder, McCullum, Guptill, Flynn, and Taylor are all vying for top 4 spots. One of them has to drop down.
TBH I don't know who should do it.
Broom looked good at hitting near the end. Oram would come in for Elliot imo
If you've got Oram and Styris back, you can afford to open with McCullum, soGuptill
Ryder
Styris
Taylor
Oram
Elliot
Broom
McCullum
Vettori
Mills
Southee
12th man Patel
If you've got Oram and Styris back, you can afford to open with McCullum, so
Ryder, McCullum, Guptill, Taylor, Styris, Oram, Elliot, Vettori, Mills, Southee, Patel