• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

How many temporary bans...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why is the electric shock giving him an unusually blurry erection? Has to count as porn IMO. Seven more for Rich.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Why is the electric shock giving him an unusually blurry erection? Has to count as porn IMO. Seven more for Rich.
Haha, you're more guilty than me, I bet no-one else would've spotted that. Well, all of those who might've are banned currently, anyway.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Having just dug-out these posts:
My guess is Perhaps went too far in his argument protesting Sledger's banning, whom he almost always defends, rightly or wrongly.
I meant, he probably did so in private via email, not publicly on the forum. If he had done so in public, it would be obvious, that's why I said it was guess on my part, I never said he actually did that. I dont know why that makes you so upset.
I'd just like to mention, in the relatively unlikely event that anyone is unaware, that they're completely ill-informed nonsense. For one, no-one gets a ban for questioning someone else's ban via em@il, you'd have to be completely clueless about forum rules to think such a thing would happen. And FTR, I haven't questioned sledger's current ban here, or indeed any of his bans anywhere, with any moderators, via any means. I've rarely aired what views I do have on said bans with anyone other than sledger himself.
 

Smudge

Hall of Fame Member
He's gone for 7 days at this stage, but the ban may be extended further due to the extend of the pornography posted and his obvious attempt to have people click on it. Discussion is pending.

It's a very serious thing posting the sort of content he posted on the forum and I certainly would have expected more from someone who's been around the forum a long time and knows what we stand for. Pornography on CW is a 100% no-no.
Pics?????



:ph34r:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top