• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

How many temporary bans...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rant0r

International 12th Man
mine was better, they actually quoted what i did, wish i'd kept it, might have to check the history.

norton 360... *shudder*
 

biased indian

International Coach
Just curious, What makes you think that it's precambrian ? Also how long the guy has been banned for ?
me also of the feeling its him ....susudear initially was just trolling bit later on started to have discussion and a lot of them and is now of much similarity to Precambrian
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think it's precambrian as well. If it is then the lengths he has gone to hide it are pathetic to the max.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Yeah the Watto bowling in India love confirmed it. He's the only one that went on about how good it was during that series, even his great legions of fans on this forum didn't make such a big deal about it.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
For a Zambian/Kiwi/American, he/she certainly makes a lot of posts between 6:30 am and Midnight, Indian Standard Time. A search revealed just one occasion when posts were made by him outside this time frame.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
And I have it on good authority that the IP traces to Zambia. We found that out when I first imagined the account was a mult33 of grapedo. He's had a good few others, so the presumption was natural.
Nor did I initially but having been given some background info by a relevant party or two I can now see precisely why the very, very strong suspicion is there. :) Will leave it to such parties to pubish said info in the public domain should they wish.

I'd like to add that if true - and I think the possibility is strong indeed - I'm incredibly annoyed as Precambrian's a poster I got (eventually) to have a huge amount of time for and thought he was great for the forum. Really annoying that he got banned for a such a silly, unneccessary incident; more annoying still that he couldn't wait a week without duplicate-accounting so thus got 7 days extended to 28; and yet more annoying still that he's apparently created another duplicate, ensured no certain (IP) detection is possible and posted in an unutterably woeful manner (this susudear's early posts were diabolical TSTL) presumably just to reduce further the possibility of detection.

Initially I'd never remotely suspected susudear of being Precamb (though I was fairly sure it was some form of mult33, and of course as I say first presumed grapedo) but having studied the matter further and had a few other things pointed-out to me, I do think it's quite likely.

Let's just hope Precambrian returns eventually and returns with his normal account, and as himself.
Don't you ever worry that your inability to at least exercise a little discretion might cause these startling revelations from your wonderful sources to dry up?
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
On the subject of bans, how long is Kweek out for, after his brain explosion last night?
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Somebody provided a way to gain access porn via the internet and I missed it!!! :-O Awww, man.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
He's gone for 7 days at this stage, but the ban may be extended further due to the extend of the pornography posted and his obvious attempt to have people click on it. Discussion is pending.

It's a very serious thing posting the sort of content he posted on the forum and I certainly would have expected more from someone who's been around the forum a long time and knows what we stand for. Pornography on CW is a 100% no-no.
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Don't you ever worry that your inability to at least exercise a little discretion might cause these startling revelations from your wonderful sources to dry up?
Nah. I know what people mind me mentioning and what they don't, TBH. I am an expert in discretion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top