I agree. He is amazing in any position as he is an exceptional athlete. He is up there with the best in World cricket.Surprised Dwayne Bravo hasn't got a mention, brilliant in the field; quick athletic, and agile. I remember him taking one of the best caught and bowled catches i have ever seen.
That was Gilly's bat speedIt left the bat pretty f***ing quick
Shame he dropped a sitter in the recent test really, but he is a decent fielder but maybe not quite as good as some of the exalted company on this thread.His batting may not be up to scratch but he is a very very Good fielder.
Tough to explain the 25 catches (or whatever it was) England put down that series via that route then.As for that Strauss catch, it only stuck to his hand because of the stickiness on the ball from the ****ing mints.
Yeah. Insofar as practical effect and importance to influencing the outcome of the longer form of the game is concerned, slips are easily the biggest players in the field. Though they've nowhere near the aesthetic appeal that a really good outfielder has. Clearly in the shorter game the outfielder's importance increases considerably but catching is still the most important skill, more than picking the ball up off the ground, diving for it or throwing it back in.As a former quick, the fielders I always valued the most were slips.
Im not overly interested in athletic out fielding or cover fielding. Thats not where I needed quality. The most important and special fielder to me is the quality slipper.
While no way disrespecting Bland's contributions to fielding, It was Jonty who made fielding a "***y artform", by showcasing electric fielding and smooth throwing in the World Cup 92. It completely changed teams' outlook to fielding and specialist point fieldsmen are in vogue since then.Colin Bland may disagree with you there susu, dear.
No Graeme Hick or Ian Botham?Yeah. Insofar as practical effect and importance to influencing the outcome of the longer form of the game is concerned, slips are easily the biggest players in the field. Though they've nowhere near the aesthetic appeal that a really good outfielder has. Clearly in the shorter game the outfielder's importance increases considerably but catching is still the most important skill, more than picking the ball up off the ground, diving for it or throwing it back in.
As far as the best I've seen are concerned:
Slipper to the seamers - Graeme Smith
Slipper to the spinners - Mark Waugh
Slipper to the seamers from England - Nick Knight, with Michael Atherton a close 2nd
Slipper to the spinners from England - Nasser Hussain
Outfielder - Jonty Rhodes (obviously)
Outfielder from England - either Paul Collingwood or Alan Mullally (joking there, obviously)
Best ever might've been Colin Bland, always wished I'd seen him field live at the ground. That's the only real way to truly appreciate the quality of an outfielder.
Botham was before my time (at least, almost all of his games were - by the time I was watching he was long past the time he should've been playing). Hick, well, yeah, he had great hands size-wise but I remember him dropping a decent share of catches, including a couple which cost a Test series (England in WI 1994). Can't ever have him up with the very best.No Graeme Hick or Ian Botham?
Randall after Bland is the fielder I've heard\read the second-most about from before my time.Derek Randall was a favourite from my youth. I seem to recall him backing up from his own throw (ran around the stumps and got the ball himself) although someone will hopefully be able to confirm or deny whether this actually happened.