KiWiNiNjA
International Coach
A bit of reverse jinxing going on, methinks.I'm surprised at the pessimism amongst a lot of you Aussies.
A bit of reverse jinxing going on, methinks.I'm surprised at the pessimism amongst a lot of you Aussies.
Agree with this. The quality might even be above Ashes '05, where the batting wasn't at the same level as the bowling and a fair few catches went down. Regardless of what happens tomorrow, this has been one of the best tests i've ever seen. The intensity's been there from the first session, the quality's been overwhelming and the match just continually swings one way then the other. There's not been a dull session, nor has there been a session completely dominated by one team. The pitch has been fair to both bowlers and batsmen and the toss hasn't impacted too heavily. It's been cricket at its very best.Yeah it's definitely been a great game.
I was actually thinking today that it's probably the highest standard of cricket I've seen in a single test match since the '05 Ashes. Might be a slight overstatement in retrospect but it's not far off, there's been some great performances and both sides have been in it from the start.
If nothing else, it's definitely the best fielding I have seen in a test match for ages, possibly ever. There's been about half a dozen blinders taken, nothing has been dropped and there's hardly been a misfield.
Would be amazing if the rest of the series was played at the same level.
That was definitely what was said when Symonds came into the side, that the No.6 position was being filled by a specialist batsman. I think Ponting and Nielsen both said that Watson wasn't in contention for that position for that reason. They said Watson would play as a fourth quick only.Symonds has been very much underbowled since his return. Really, he's being picked as a number six batsman, rather than as any sort of batting allrounder. For mine, struggling with the ball as we are, I would much rather see Watson fill that number six slot. To that end, with our bowling, I really don't think we can afford to have two greenhorns still learning on the job, Siddle and Krejza, in the same attack against such a good side as South Africa.
Bowled a couple of absolute jaffers to Smith. They handled him pretty comfortably for the most part though.How did Krejza bowl anyway? Decent enough, or was he simply not getting anything from the surface?
And champagne pie bowling as well. Sorry I don't rate Krezja, even with his 12 wickets on debut and his ball to get Amla out in the 1st innings.Yeah, quality fare served up in this match. I have loved the way the ascendency has swung from one side to the other - both sides have got up off the mat at various stages. Anyway, can't let Kallis's cameo before stumps go unremarked upon. It was champagne cricket from the great man.
He was getting a decent amount of spin and drift. But overall he probably wasn't bowling consistently enough to really trouble the South Africans for long periods of time. Although he did bowl some really good deliveries.How did Krejza bowl anyway? Decent enough, or was he simply not getting anything from the surface?
Totally agree. Kallis was awesome, but Krezja was very poor (so was Siddle).And champagne pie bowling as well. Sorry I don't rate Krezja, even with his 12 wickets on debut and his ball to get Amla out in the 1st innings.