He did it on debut against South Africa and has repeated it since.Thought Martin had never hit a boundary against a Test-class team?
Yeah, I imagine after about 50-odd FC games that most test players have, and God knows how long in the nets, you sort of pick up some basic level of batting. At least some ability to defend if not to score runs. Even McGrath finally conquered his batting demons! I remember at one point McGrath had more wickets than he had test runs. Same with Murali, I believe.Personally quite surprised that there has not been more batsmen of Martin's inability at international level, but I suppose that people pick it up if they recieve much practice against high quality bowling in the nets and such.
Just can't give a guy credit even after he's proved you wrong. You have to caveat your acceptance with another go at him.Haven't really seen much of O'Brien but even though his bowling has gotten massively better in his last few games his batting is still 100% O'Diren. MSP obviously isn't many great shakes but occasionally has played the odd half-decent short innings.
I acknowledge the fact that you now recognise that he can bowl.Dicky Dickensian Dickinson said:FFS. Your ability to read stuff into my posts, even without wanting to, is becoming second to few. I was quite obviously referring to O'Brien's batting with the diren comment.
Yeah, baseball pitchers aren't required to bat, either. Interesting point you bring up...As a kind of related aside, is there another sporting equivalent of tail-end batsmen? I personally can't think of any other top level sport where we get to see the participants performing a skill they are so utterly unsuited to doing so.
I mean, prop forwards aren't required to kick penalities in union nor do we see wingers being made to go into goal for the last five minutes of a football match. Tailenders give us a rare glimpse of what it would be like for the average joe to face up to top-level sportsmen.
& Chris Martin, obv. Although his batting is still better than his singing.
Decathletes running the 1500 metres spring to mind.As a kind of related aside, is there another sporting equivalent of tail-end batsmen? I personally can't think of any other top level sport where we get to see the participants performing a skill they are so utterly unsuited to doing so.
I mean, prop forwards aren't required to kick penalities in union nor do we see wingers being made to go into goal for the last five minutes of a football match. Tailenders give us a rare glimpse of what it would be like for the average joe to face up to top-level sportsmen.
& Chris Martin, obv. Although his batting is still better than his singing.
As does Geoff Thomas trying to chip the ball.Decathletes running the 1500 metres spring to mind.
They are in in the real league.Yeah, baseball pitchers aren't required to bat, either. Interesting point you bring up...
Do you mean MLB or some other league? Still, shows how much I know about baseball... Unfortunately, I've never been able to branch out my love and enthusiasm for cricket into other American sports...They are in in the real league.
In the National League pitchers are required to bat, but in the American League they aren't (a designated hitter bats in their place).Yeah, baseball pitchers aren't required to bat, either. Interesting point you bring up...
Also annoys me that you blame me as if I'd invented the damn thing (ie, the abysmal pun). Obviously, I did nothing of the sort.I acknowledge the fact that you now recognise that he can bowl.
However, you are still unfairly using that abysmal pun in relation to the poor sod despite the fact that he played an exceptional rear-guard duck and managed to hold out for nearly an hour (a good deal longer than most of New Zealand's batting order) against in particular, a Brett Lee who would have wanted to knock his block off.
I had read your post, but your insistance at still finding something to criticise about the one Kiwi player who showed an amount of ticker well in excess of his ability is still incredibly poor form. Even ignoring my bias, he was a contender for Kiwi player of the series, and part of that is due to him showing some application with the bat that some of his more vaunted collegues should have shown.
Just bin that awful puntastic nickname and I think we can let the matter rest. Otherwise, I promise to always refer to Mike Atherton as "Mike Awfulton" or "Mike... Ton? Not ****ing likely"