We commentators can afford to laugh at ourselves sometimes. Here's what Ragu, one of our readers, observes: "One of the most asinine comments that I hear nowadays is "he will take it" when a batsman gates a lucky boundary after playing a false shot. Does he have a choice? Imagine the batsman going up the umpire and saying "Ump, I don't want that 4 as I did not play a proper shot and it flew off the edge so deduct it from my and the team's total."
ITSTL
Should get him through to the tea breakWas that... down the ground?
Ease up Flynn.Should get him through to the tea break
yeah flynn you don't want to rock the boat too much.Ease up Flynn.
Carried? I didn't think so.dropped catch.
Only saw it live, going on that.Carried? I didn't think so.
who was it?Worst commentary I have ever seen. What the hell was he going on about with that bouncer?!
I'm not an expert on commentators. The one 12th man takes the piss out of for always saying "right off the meat of the bat."who was it?
Yeah Tony pisses me off.I'm not an expert on commentators. The one 12th man takes the piss out of for always saying "right off the meat of the bat."
Tony Greig? The tall bald guy who always wears a hat.
Went on about how great a bouncer was from Johnson, saying it was right on the mark and all this crap. It was wide outside off, a good 5th or 6th stump, and didn't trouble Vettori in the slightest.
I like that he values his wicket. I don't like that after 400 balls, he's still batting with no confidence at all.I quite like Flynn. So nice to see a kiwi batsman actually value his wicket.