zaremba
Cricketer Of The Year
Not as far as I know - give me the name of the person you're thinking of and I'll let you knowI think I'll duck out of this one - was a Manchester City footballer in a leading role?
Not as far as I know - give me the name of the person you're thinking of and I'll let you knowI think I'll duck out of this one - was a Manchester City footballer in a leading role?
Nope.Jack Dyson - scored in the cup final that same year
NoNewzealand won their first test in this year ?
You mean this is not your answer or that this did not happen because it did.
Nothing to do with Lanky or Leicestershire - is it true that you beat them without losing a wicket? I'd never heard that. Much more interesting than my question, but hey.well apart from some Surrey off spinner whose name I've forgotten taking 376 Australian wickets at 2.67 each I didn't think anything else happened in 56 except Lancashire's famous victory over Leicestershire without losing a wicket
No - Laker's TestCounty Championship?
It's not my answer. I'm not disputing it happened!You mean this is not your answer or that this did not happen because it did.
Yes - specifically the 1956 Test in which Laker took 19 wickets.Does this relate to international cricket?
I doubt that many people at the time. If it happened now, which as I say is extremely unlikely, it would be quite extraordinary and would certainly be noticed.Is this something whcih would not be generally noticed?
No - that's bound to happen again. (ps were they forgetting about their watering of their pitch in 1954/55?)The Australians complained that the pitch was rigged (and still do)?
No. But the question relates to the England batsmen who played in the match (Compton was not one of them).The batsman (Denis Compton) who top scored in the match only had one kneecap?
Yes it does, and you are an evil genius Fred .Does it relate to the first five England batsmen being amateurs?