SirBloody Idiot
Cricketer Of The Year
One of the worst bowling attacks in the world at the moment, IMO.
Not really. The thing is that the Indians managed to decode his style of bowling last summer in Aus, and they confirmed it here. Usual "outside off stump" deliveries were left alone, and the incoming ones despatched. Clark never looked menacing enough at any point this series.So in other words, he's been about as effective as the rest of the Australian bowlers on this tour?
But he's been better, because atleast he has gone at a low economy rate. The only bowler who has looked likely keeping the Indian batsmen in check this series.
Thats one way to look at it.Pretty awesome tail though, Johnson at 11 is better than most teams number 8.
This is the other.One of the worst bowling attacks in the world at the moment, IMO.
I've said it before, but we really need to look at the selectors. They have started to pick insane (subcontinent-like) selections for the sake of it, and they are backfiring ridiculously.Good old Mervyn Hughes, as the touring selector, favours White once again.
Seriously, do we not have anybody more qualified than Hughes?
Subcontinent-like?I've said it before, but we really need to look at the selectors. They have started to pick insane (subcontinent-like) selections for the sake of it, and they are backfiring ridiculously.
Random/illogical/brainless? All apply.Subcontinent-like?
Massive LOLS. 14 wickets at 28.21, streaks ahead of all the Indian pacers and second best of everyone in the series.Not really. The thing is that the Indians managed to decode his style of bowling last summer in Aus, and they confirmed it here. Usual "outside off stump" deliveries were left alone, and the incoming ones despatched. Clark never looked menacing enough at any point this series.