1)Not sure what the law has to say about being in the crease and then lifting your foot after the removal of bails has started.Personally, I blame Haddin. A Gilchristian appeal there would've gotten the 3rd umpire.
And Cevno, you're kidding. It would have been a tough one for the umpire on the field but for the 3rd, was pretty conclusive. We've definitely not heard the last of this one.
Need a hundred!
I think the law states the batsman is given not out only if he left the crease after grounding to prevent injury1)Not sure what the law has to say about being in the crease and then lifting your foot after the removal of bails has started.
2)At the time when the bails were completely dislodged was his foot grounded ,or not.Because the process of removal of bails started when his foot was grounded and his foot was grounded again before it ended.(At what point did the bails were completely dislodged?)
Does Ramesh Powar count?Kapil. That's pretty much it.
Not anymoreWell, they got the better end of the deal. They have had some fantastic batsmen too, in addition to the Imrans, Wasims, etc.
I think the law states the batsman is given not out only if he left the crease after grounding to prevent injury
Even that didnt help Tendulkar in Kolkota test of 99 vs Pakistan. Where he grounded his bat, and collided with Akthar, and just when the ball hit stumps had the bat in air. Was given out.
Eyes on the prize.
Mohd Yusuf and Younis Khan are superb batsmen. And Misbah could be a late bloomer. It's just unfortunate they are not getting the needed amount of cricket.Not anymore
Its a matter of time before you guys become #1
Ten is very achievable. Only being 2 over behind is not criminal at all.Fireworks lasted for 5 minutes. Okay, take one over off, still 12 overs in 40 minutes?
He'd like to. But them bowlers are tired.Need a wicket or two before stumps, so should Ponting take the new ball this evening?