• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official Australia in India***

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Personally, I blame Haddin. A Gilchristian appeal there would've gotten the 3rd umpire.

And Cevno, you're kidding. It would have been a tough one for the umpire on the field but for the 3rd, was pretty conclusive. We've definitely not heard the last of this one.
1)Not sure what the law has to say about being in the crease and then lifting your foot after the removal of bails has started.

2)At the time when the bails were completely dislodged was his foot grounded ,or not.Because the process of removal of bails started when his foot was grounded and his foot was grounded again before it ended.(At what point did the bails were completely dislodged?)
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Seriously, Johnson needs to send a thank you card to the Indian dressing room. Award for 'Doing most to make an opposition player look world class.'
 

Precambrian

Banned
1)Not sure what the law has to say about being in the crease and then lifting your foot after the removal of bails has started.

2)At the time when the bails were completely dislodged was his foot grounded ,or not.Because the process of removal of bails started when his foot was grounded and his foot was grounded again before it ended.(At what point did the bails were completely dislodged?)
I think the law states the batsman is given not out only if he left the crease after grounding to prevent injury

Even that didnt help Tendulkar in Kolkota test of 99 vs Pakistan. Where he grounded his bat, and collided with Akthar, and just when the ball hit stumps had the bat in air. Was given out.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
I think the law states the batsman is given not out only if he left the crease after grounding to prevent injury

Even that didnt help Tendulkar in Kolkota test of 99 vs Pakistan. Where he grounded his bat, and collided with Akthar, and just when the ball hit stumps had the bat in air. Was given out.


That is the run out law, i believe.
And it also says-
(e) he is out of his ground, not attempting a run and his wicket is fairly put down by the wicket-keeper without the intervention of another member of the fielding side then it is not out.
http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-38-run-out,64,AR.html
 

Top