If you hit a double-century in your most recent Test series and have not retired (or were not a replacement player), you play the next.haha, no way Jaffar should have been on the plane to Australia [yes, I know he had hit a double against Pak] and then been in the 11 with someone like Sehwag in the squad
my 2 cents
sure just like you have a spinner take a 5-er on a turning wkt in a series in India and then you play him on a seaming wkt at Durban *rolleyes*If you hit a double-century in your most recent Test series and have not retired (or were not a replacement player), you play the next.
No two ways about.
Ah, my fault. Mishra then.Mishra is in the squad, Chawla isn't, IIRC.
It's a different game. If you're going to dismiss someone with a fantastic history of performance, at least do it after giving them a shot.You want Gagandeep Singh in? He looked most unimpressive in the IPL. Although I am the aware of crossing between formats, Gagandeep looked slow and was absolutely hammered in the IPL. Rarely does a strong Test bowler get hammered so hard in T20.
Badrinath. Misspell any other Indian players name and I wouldn't bat an eyelid, but not Badrinath - Subramaniam Badrinath.For mine:
1. Chopara
2. Sehwag
3. Gambhir
4. Baranith
5. Kaif/Kohli
6. Sharma
Batsmen and fingerspinners are not the same thing.sure just like you have a spinner take a 5-er on a turning wkt in a series in India and then you play him on a seaming wkt at Durban *rolleyes*
typical reply .... so you agree that you won't pick an ordinary spinner who did well on a spin friendly pitch in India on a tour to SA or Aus .... thanksBatsmen and fingerspinners are not the same thing.
Yes, and I also agree that this is utterly irrelevant to what you do when a batsman is the one under the microscope.so you agree that you won't pick an ordinary spinner who did well on a spin friendly pitch in India on a tour to SA or Aus
Detail was never one of your strong points.S will do me fine TBH.
Not where complicated Indian forenames which begin with S are concerned, no.Detail was never one of your strong points.
Whoosh.Not where complicated Indian forenames which begin with S are concerned, no.
[B]Player Inns NO 50s 100s HS Runs Avg[/B]
Sehwag 24 1 2 3 319 1177 51.17
Ganguly 43 4 9 4 239 1842 47.23
Sachin 36 3 9 4 *154 1558 47.21
Laxman 37 8 10 2 *112 1356 46.76
Dravid 43 4 7 2 129 1292 33.13