Well, 1-5 are out of the question at this point so it's either 6, 7 or out of the team from my perspective. I'd much rather have Symonds at 6, hence why I said 7. It's not ideal but there isn't much else for him if Symonds is to be picked.Watson's not that well suited to 6 to begin with, no way he should bat at 7.
Post IPL i would agree with this, but not anymore. Since Watson has proven to me that he has evolved from this robotic player who was solid againts pace but weak againts that had limited shots, that if faced with circumstances i.e the current test match, didn't have a plan B to his batting.Watson's not that well suited to 6 to begin with, no way he should bat at 7.
Tut tut. Why are you letting common sense get in the way of a blonde haired adonis who is clearly the greatest gift to cricket since Heefy D?Not to rain on the Watson orgy, but maybe people should wait to see if he can actually play at this level? Maybe I'm out of line but at least let him score a fifty in Tests before dislodging guys who are averaging 60+ on form....
If stuff is raining down upon you, you may have stumbled into the wrong orgy.Orgies are better in the rain AFAIC.
Needs to find someone new to **** over, now that Symonds isn't on tour.Mark Nicholas Shane Watson