Atherton is apparently not sure why de Villiers got booed, hmm.
Big applause on the balcony but boos around the ground, it's not clear why. So he briings up 100 runs from 264 balls, the slowest of his Test hundreds
How thick are Cricinfo commentators (and Atherton too it seems)?
Few similar posts coming in then.Atherton being slightly disingenuous there "A round of boos, I'm not sure why?". Claiming grassed catches never likely to endear a player to the opposing fans is it, Michael?
Poor show from the crowd all the same, like to think we're better than that as a nation.
Not that I can remember, no.BTW having not seen any of yesterday's second and third sessions (whatever there was between rain) I'm not totally sure if there were any let-offs - were there?
I don't think he would, though. I cannot ever see a 30-year-old who's been playing on merit top-level cricket for all of 3 months being capable of much Test success.I'm struggling to see any hint of logic in that. If he were to do well then we would have discovered a bowler capable of success at Test level. In which case I'd have no problem him being in the frame for more games.
WTF?Blah blah obvious fluke blah blah not test class blah blah Dominic Cork better blah blah first chance average
Well that's a different thing entirely. You're now saying you don't think he will succeed. Earlier on you were saying you hoped he failed.I don't think he would, though. I cannot ever see a 30-year-old who's been playing top-level cricket for all of 3 months being capable of much Test success.
Oh come off it, it's plainly top-class cricket, regardless of the reasons why he was playing it.Pattinson made his Victoria debut in 2006/07, played 3 First-Class games that season, and 2 the next one. He was only ever a replacement player when Harwood\Lewis\McDonald\Wise\Denton\Nannes\McKay\Siddle were injured. I'd hardly count that as playing top-level cricket myself.
I hope he fails this match because I don't believe he can succeed long-term.Well that's a different thing entirely. You're now saying you don't think he will succeed. Earlier on you were saying you hoped he failed.
But 3 games in one season and 2 in the next isn't exactly playing it regularly, is it? And it's especially questionable when so many players have to be missing for you to get the gig.Oh come off it, it's plainly top-class cricket, regardless of the reasons why he was playing it.
But luckily Vaughn got exactly what he deserved after his 'catch' so it's all good.I've got to admit I'm perfectly happy about ABdV getting booed. I'm disappointed that he got any runs at all in fact.
He did?luckily Vaughn got exactly what he deserved after his 'catch'
You're right. Perhaps Nexxus will enlighten us what he's banging on aboutBut he said "after his 'catch'" - nothing of note has happened to Vaughan after his Amla catch\near-catch. Apart from the catch being turned-down of course - which ended-up making not-that-much difference as Amla was out before that many had been added.
Yup, a very good cricketer.How good is de Villiers? One of my favourite cricketers. Has so much potential.