Because Collingwood charges out there and tries to score at 4-5 an over doesn't he just like the rest of these soft flair players?Lets face it. I doubt 1 more batsmen (especially Collingwood) would have made much of a difference to this inept batting display.
So Collingwood was banned for that farcical Elliott run out against New Zealand? I don't see the difference really.. Gamesmanship of the worst order on both counts..Needs banning. Not just a questionable carry - it carried, he dropped it, and then he claimed it anyway. Cheating, pure and simple.
Steyn has to fancy his chances against Flintoff, and be very disappointed if he doesn't get the wicket.
Flintoff flying to a flyer.
Question is - will it continue for long? Never looks convincing.
How many times does one need to repeat a point?Kallis should do juuuuuuuuuust fine against Flintoff... if he could actually get any swing. Outswingers should always do the job against Flintoff.
But so could just bowling. Ntini almost gets him with a nothing ball outside off, instead he gets his first Test runs for over 18 months.
60,755.. Point being, where is the ignore function?How many times does one need to repeat a point?
No, nothing to do with that. It was for a slow over-rate.So Collingwood was banned for that farcical Elliott run out against New Zealand?
Completely different question. Strauss is obviously British. Birthplace is irrelevant, it's upbringing that counts.Weren't Strauss's parents South African, and he was born there? Nobody talks about him as a SA'n..
Nah. It had to happen eventually, as I said. Surprised he lasted that long.60,755.. Point being, where is the ignore function?
He guessed it though.How many times does one need to repeat a point?
If the likes of Vaughan and Bell couldn't last, he wouldn't've stood a chance IMO.Reckon England missed Collingwood today. Would be not out currently, batting with Freddy. But no, England are dire.