If saying "I couldn't care less about Twenty20" (which is about the only thing I say about it with any regularity and without prompt from "discuss Twenty20" threads) is "bashing" it heaven help us.Agreed. TH's "Vettori bashing" is becoming as boring, predictible and as over the top as both Richard's constant bashing of 20/20 cricket and SP's constant bagging of NZ cricket.
I'd say so: dead ball would've been the call. It would have to be with the stumps broken and the batsman short of his ground I imagine.Question.
Say Collingwood chose not to appeal.
Surely NZ shouldn't get the run right? Elliot should have gone back to the striker's end.
I agree there are probably bigger issues in heaven & earth, but as the 2nd ODI showed slow over rates can enter the realm of sharp practice.Slow over rates in ODI, who cares? As long as they face 50 overs each who cares. I always thought they only worried because of the TV having to start their news late
I can only assume that Hopkins is hitting them better in the nets, because there is no question who the better batsman is.Why oh why if Elliott can't play, why oh why can't Peter Fulton finally get a game FFS?
Nah, not surprising at all - been like this for 3 summers now.No day-nighters in this series then? Surprising - and rather inconvenient for our NZ friends.
Going to the Headingley game, expecting the side batting second to be out for <150...especially if it's England.There will indeed - the First, Second and Fifth ODIs of that series will be day\nighters.
Worryingly, though, the formermost of them is at Headingley. Would've been so much better to have it at The Oval.