• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Championless Trophy? - stop the bs and go

Athlai

Not Terrible
MrHat for future reference:

[ quote ] content [ /quote ] is the tool you use to split up another persons reply. (without the spaces)

Also...

AWTA means agree with the above. DWTA disagree.
Don't ever argue with Richard, Murali vs. Warne is not worth the trouble and don't support Australia if you want friends from anywhere else. ;)

Enjoy your time here.
 

MrHat

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
:laugh: That's just funny, and you'd be dissuaded of that notion quite quickly if you lived or followed Indian news.
i'd be more confident in Indian security than Pakistani security. I am not getting nasty or trying to slur Pakistani's but I am just saying things are more difficult there

It's pretty much the same people.

Haha, what are you on about? Many terrorists are home grown in India. Have you seen the demographics in India?
Yes I know its diverse. I still think they are less likely to poke their heads up because Kashmir is their issue and their goal
 
Last edited:

MrHat

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
MrHat for future reference:

[ quote ] content [ /quote ] is the tool you use to split up another persons reply. (without the spaces)

Also...

AWTA means agree with the above. DWTA disagree.
Don't ever argue with Richard, Murali vs. Warne is not worth the trouble and don't support Australia if you want friends from anywhere else. ;)

Enjoy your time here.
Thankyou I will get it eventually
 

biased indian

International Coach
i'd be more confident in Indian security than Pakistani security. I am not getting nasty or trying to slur Pakistani's but I am just saying things are more difficult there

the same security who once shot dead their on prime minister ????:unsure:
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
The Presidential security offer started lacking cred when Bhutto was shot. I am not saying that is totally right, but you can understand how that incident caused concern. If they couldn't protect just her how can a team of 20 blokes be safe. There are legitimate concerns that noone is untouchable in Pakistan, whatever the security
As has been pointed out, Benazir was specifically targeted. Also, she was at a public rally, against the advice of the security provided to her. The foreign teams will be provided Presidential-level security, and are not likely to attend political rallies. Going by past precedent, their hotel rooms would only hold them as guests, no unauthorized person/car would be allowed anywhere near them, and they would travel with a ratio of like 20 security officials per team member.
 

MrHat

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
As opposed to the assassination of Bhutto?
I used the Bhutto example to show the fallability of Pakistani security. Point I am making re India is that terrorist causes in India revolve around Kashmir. In Pakistan the anti western movement would be much larger.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
I used the Bhutto example to show the fallability of Pakistani security
But the fallibility of Indian security with the attack on Parliament is not valid?

Point I am making re India is that terrorist causes in India revolve around Kashmir.
Except there was a huge bomb blast in Jaipur not long ago. And there have been big blasts in Bombay as well. If it happens in Jaipur or Bombay, it's just something to deal with, but if they happen in Karachi or Peshawar, it's something to boycott?
 

MrHat

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
But the fallibility of Indian security with the attack on Parliament is not valid?



Except there was a huge bomb blast in Jaipur not long ago. And there have been big blasts in Bombay as well. If it happens in Jaipur or Bombay, it's just something to deal with, but if they happen in Karachi or Peshawar, it's something to boycott?
Its a question of targetting not just general safety.
 

MrHat

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
A bomb planted in the produce market of Jaipur and the produce market of Karachi has very little difference in terms of the target demographic.
I am going around in circles. Australia is more likely to be targetted by jihadists in Pakistan than in India. We can agree to disagree on this. This is one of the reasons they are less willing to go to Pakistan, that and general greater level of violence, although if this changing so will attitudes but that will take time. Though I'd be sure CA don't want Jaipur on their next itinery. I am not saying Australia will get blown up when they are in Pakistan next, I am saying that these concerns are not BS. Gn...
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
I am going around in circles. Australia is more likely to be targetted by jihadists in Pakistan than in India.
Based on?


Though I'd be sure CA don't want Jaipur on their next itinery.
Or Mumbai or Delhi?

I am not saying Australia will get blown up when they are in Pakistan next, I am saying that these concerns are not BS. Gn...
Never said they were BS. I'm saying if they are valid in Pakistan, they are pretty much valid in India.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
I'd like to see them play in medieval armour with jousting sticks. And when the opposition batsman comes creaking to the crease someone in the Australian slips cordon would say 'Jousting sticks...what's he askin'...and the batsmen would go '$250'...and the slips could would all say in unison 'Tell him he's dreamin'.


I'd be sitting on the lounge at home with tears running down my face and wet pants.
Interesting placement of a reference to The Castle.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I used the Bhutto example to show the fallability of Pakistani security. Point I am making re India is that terrorist causes in India revolve around Kashmir. In Pakistan the anti western movement would be much larger.
You seem to have gotten it into your head that every other terrorist in Pakistan is out to kill any American/European/Australian guy he meets...


I can understand why the Aussies are reluctant to tour. It is because of previous precedents set by their predecessors and somehow, a stigma has been attached to touring Pakistan (wrongly, IMO). So I can understand why those guys are so reluctant but honestly, there is no way to defend it as the right thing. The best thing you can say about their concerns is that they are perhaps understandable, but no way are they justifiable.


There are places in India where the threat is just as high as there is in Pakistan and yet Aussies don't have a problem because of two reasons:

a. There is no such stigma attached with India as there is with Pakistan (mainly based on wrong perceptions, if I may add that)

b. Money. Moolah does talk and they all know that there is a good amount of money to be made if you are an Aussie cricketer touring India. The Ads, the IPL contracts and now even Bollywood cameos being on the anvil makes it a more viable proposition and they are willing to take that chance against security advice.



At the end of the day, the blame should sit with CA for not being man enough to send the players (whoever are ready to play) on tour. I am sure if there is one tour by an Aussie team to Pak, even the players who have concerns will be ready to tour the next time.
 

Top