Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
And money lost after legal action by the BCCI.There are places in India where the threat is just as high as there is in Pakistan and yet Aussies don't have a problem because of two reasons:
a. There is no such stigma attached with India as there is with Pakistan (mainly based on wrong perceptions, if I may add that)
b. Money. Moolah does talk and they all know that there is a good amount of money to be made if you are an Aussie cricketer touring India. The Ads, the IPL contracts and now even Bollywood cameos being on the anvil makes it a more viable proposition and they are willing to take that chance against security advice.
Now hang on a sec; if you want to blame someone, blame DFAT. CA take their advice from them, a federal government agency no less. It's pretty clear that CA aren't well enough informed to make a decision themselves so they have to trust someone and DFAT are the logical choice in this country. Could you imagine the outcry if CA ignored the very government agency tasked to provide this info? Not to mention the lawsuits to follow if something bad did happen? They'd be rightly pillored and sued into oblivion. Following the advice of DFAT is a prudent business decision by CA, perfectly justifiable and there's no-one, put into a similar position, who wouldn't do the same.At the end of the day, the blame should sit with CA for not being man enough to send the players (whoever are ready to play) on tour. I am sure if there is one tour by an Aussie team to Pak, even the players who have concerns will be ready to tour the next time.
In the eyes of DFAT, India and Pakistan are not the same level of risk for a touring party and there's no getting past that. It's absolutely no surprise that CA would choose to tour accordingly. Whether the basis for DFAT's info is questionable or not, that's the way it is. And if I had legal responsibility for the safety of anyone, anecdotal info from non-official sources wouldn't cut it for me either.